When choosing between the ASUS ROG Strix G18 and the ASUS TUF Gaming F17, consider that the ROG Strix is usually more expensive because it offers top-tier performance, which is beneficial for demanding tasks like high-end gaming or 3D rendering. The TUF Gaming F17, on the other hand, provides good performance at a more accessible price point, suitable for everyday use and moderate gaming. The Strix's higher cost reflects its cutting-edge components and build quality, which could translate into longer-term value if you need its advanced capabilities. However, if budget and general use are priorities, the TUF may be a smarter choice. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the ASUS ROG Strix G18 (2024)
Very good for general use
Excellent for engineering and design
Very good for gaming and AI
Very good for software development
Very good for content creation
Very good overall display quality
Good battery life
Best in class speakers
Very good keyboard
Advantages of the ASUS TUF Gaming F17
The ASUS TUF Gaming F17 has no clear advantages over the ASUS ROG Strix G18 (2024).
Key differences
General Use
8.7/10
7.1/10
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
422.0 nits
DISPLAY BRIGHTNESS
264.0 nits
8.0 Hours
BATTERY LIFE
4.5 Hours
8.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.0/10
5.6/10
PORTABILITY SCORE
6.4/10
The ASUS ROG Strix G18 (2024) is very good for general use, while the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 is good.
The ASUS ROG Strix G18 typically offers a more powerful CPU and higher RAM, leading to smoother performance for a range of applications, and it usually features a superior screen quality, which enhances the overall user experience; however, this comes at the cost of reduced portability and often shorter battery life compared to the more modestly equipped ASUS TUF Gaming F17, which may be easier to carry around and use on the go. Additionally, while the TUF F17's storage, keyboard, speakers, cooling, and noise level are adequate, the premium ROG Strix model often betters these aspects, justifying its higher price and appeal for more demanding users.
Gaming and AI
8.7/10
6.6/10
8.9/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
5.2/10
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
Yes
SUPPORTS DLSS
Yes
Yes
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
No
7.2/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
7.5/10
The ASUS ROG Strix G18 (2024) is very good for gaming and AI, while the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 is only fair.
The ASUS ROG Strix G18 is equipped with a higher-end GPU and a faster screen refresh rate, which are crucial for smooth gaming and efficient 3D rendering, making it excellent for these tasks. On the other hand, the ASUS TUF Gaming F17, while still capable, has a less powerful GPU and a lower screen refresh rate, which makes it fair for gaming and 3D applications, but not as optimal as the G18.
Engineering and Design
9.2/10
6.9/10
9.9/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
6.2/10
8.9/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
5.2/10
32.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
The ASUS ROG Strix G18 (2024) is excellent for engineering and design, while the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 is only fair.
The ASUS ROG Strix G18 typically comes with higher-end CPUs, more RAM, and more powerful GPUs, alongside better screen quality, making it well-suited for demanding engineering tasks and design work that requires efficient multitasking and precise visuals. Although the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 also offers solid performance for engineering and design, it trades off some power and display fidelity for increased portability and potentially quieter operation, which might be preferable for users who value a balance between performance and mobility.
Content Creation
8.8/10
7.1/10
9.9/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
6.2/10
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
32.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
The ASUS ROG Strix G18 (2024) is very good for content creation, while the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 is good.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
8.5/10
6.7/10
9.9/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
6.2/10
32.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
8.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.0/10
The ASUS ROG Strix G18 (2024) is very good for software development, while the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 is only fair.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Screen Quality
8.7/10
6.9/10
18.0in
SIZE
17.3in
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
422.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
264.0 nits
The ASUS ROG Strix G18 has a better screen than the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, software development, and content creation.
The ASUS ROG Strix G18 boasts a high-resolution display with great color accuracy covering a wide range of color gamuts, which is crucial for engineering and design work requiring precise colors. However, for Gaming and 3D applications where refresh rate is key, this laptop falls short, affecting the smoothness and responsiveness of the visuals. The ASUS TUF Gaming F17 delivers adequate resolution and brightness for everyday tasks, but it has subpar color gamut coverage and refresh rate, making it less ideal for color-critical work and high-speed gaming.
Battery
8.0 Hours
4.5 Hours
The ASUS ROG Strix G18 has 8 hours of battery life. The ASUS TUF Gaming F17 has 4.5 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Poor
Fair
18.0in
SIZE
17.3in
6.6 lbs
WEIGHT
5.7 lbs
1.0in
THICKNESS
0.9in
The ASUS TUF Gaming F17 has only fair portability, while the ASUS ROG Strix G18 (2024) has poor portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Build Quality
7.8/10
7.2/10
The ASUS ROG Strix G18 (2024) and ASUS TUF Gaming F17 both have good build quality, though the ASUS ROG Strix G18 (2024) has somewhat better build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Cost
$2,203
$1,000
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
$3,500
The ASUS ROG Strix G18 (2024) has a price of $2,203 and the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 costs $1,000.
"With the ROG Strix G18, Asus has made an almost consistently good debut in the still quite new 18-inch laptop segment. The base unit case shows a few signs of weakness in the area of stability and is something which has an effect on the perceived quality of the input devices (the chassis tends to rattle a bit). Nevertheless, thanks to generous port features (incl. Thunderbolt 4), a striking design, and extensive lighting (keyboard, LED strip on the front), gamers get a fitting gaming platform."
"One of the Asus TUF Gaming F17’s highlights is without a doubt its excellent gaming performance. The fact that Asus configured the RTX 3060 GPU for its specified maximum of 140 W is became immediately noticeable in our benchmarks. For a 17-inch notebook the F17 also offers a very long battery life, which makes it somewhat portable. On the flip side is the display. It may be saved by its good overall contrast ratio, but its overall brightness is simply too low, and its response times are too slow for a gaming device. The F17’s successor needs to improve upon this."
Get a great deal on the ASUS ROG Strix G18 (2024) or the ASUS TUF Gaming F17
About ASUS
ASUS, a Taiwanese electronics brand, is one of the largest personal computer vendor by market share. The majority of their laptops are targeted towards personal use or gaming. Their most popular product lines include the budget-friendly VivoBook, more premium ZenBook, and their TUF and ROG gaming laptops, the latter of which has a reputation for excellent gaming performance.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
101,595
Recommendations made
22,013
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.