The Acer Swift X 16 offers a balance of performance and portability with a higher resolution screen, better battery life, and a lightweight design compared to the ASUS TUF Gaming F17. It is well-suited for general use and some engineering tasks. The ASUS TUF Gaming F17, on the other hand, has a larger screen and enhanced gaming-oriented features like a high refresh rate and RGB backlit keyboard, but it is heavier with a shorter battery life, making it less portable. It may be ideal for gaming and 3D tasks on a budget, while its lower resolution and color accuracy could be limiting for some engineering uses. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer Swift X 16
Very good for general use
Very good for engineering and design
Good for gaming and AI
Very good for software development
Very good for content creation
Very good overall display quality
Good portability
Good battery life
Very good speakers
Very good keyboard
Advantages of the ASUS TUF Gaming F17
The ASUS TUF Gaming F17 has no clear advantages over the Acer Swift X 16.
Key differences
General Use
8.2/10
7.1/10
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
402.0 nits
DISPLAY BRIGHTNESS
264.0 nits
8.0 Hours
BATTERY LIFE
4.5 Hours
8.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.0/10
7.6/10
PORTABILITY SCORE
6.4/10
The Acer Swift X 16 is very good for general use, while the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 is good.
The Acer Swift X 16 offers a balance suitable for general use with better portability due to its lighter weight and smaller size, alongside longer battery life and higher screen quality with greater brightness and color coverage, which enhances everyday tasks. The ASUS TUF Gaming F17, designed with a gaming focus, is heavier and bulkier, has a shorter battery life, and a lower screen resolution and color coverage, which may affect multitasking and media consumption for general users.
Engineering and Design
8.2/10
6.9/10
9.1/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
6.2/10
4.9/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
5.2/10
16.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
The Acer Swift X 16 is very good for engineering and design, while the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 is only fair.
The Acer Swift X 16 offers a more robust processor and higher screen quality, factors that are very important for engineering and design tasks, making it very suitable for such work. Conversely, the ASUS TUF Gaming F17, while still providing adequate performance for engineering, places more emphasis on gaming aspects like a larger screen for immersion and better heat management, which may compromise portability and operating noise.
Content Creation
8.3/10
7.1/10
9.1/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
6.2/10
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
16.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
The Acer Swift X 16 is very good for content creation, while the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 is good.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
8.0/10
6.7/10
9.1/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
6.2/10
16.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
8.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.0/10
The Acer Swift X 16 is very good for software development, while the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 is only fair.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Screen Quality
8.2/10
6.9/10
16.0in
SIZE
17.3in
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
402.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
264.0 nits
The Acer Swift X 16 has a better screen than the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, software development, and content creation.
When considering general use, the Acer Swift X 16 offers a high-resolution display and brightness, making images and text sharp and easy to view in various lighting conditions. For engineering and design, the Swift X 16 covers more of the professional color gamuts, ensuring that colors are reproduced accurately for critical work. However, for gaming and 3D applications, its lower refresh rate may lead to less smooth motion compared to laptops designed specifically for those purposes, such as the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 which has a higher refresh rate but sacrifices some color accuracy and resolution.
Battery
8.0 Hours
4.5 Hours
The Acer Swift X 16 has 8 hours of battery life. The ASUS TUF Gaming F17 has 4.5 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Good
Fair
16.0in
SIZE
17.3in
4.1 lbs
WEIGHT
5.7 lbs
0.7in
THICKNESS
0.9in
The Acer Swift X 16 has good portability, while the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 has only fair portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Cost
$1,250
$1,000
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
The Acer Swift X 16 has a price of $1,250 and the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 costs $1,000.
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Acer Swift X 16 to be good for gaming and AI, while the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 is only fair.
The Acer Swift X 16 boasts a higher screen refresh rate which is essential for smoother visuals in gaming and 3D applications, compared to the ASUS TUF Gaming F17; however, the latter's Nvidia RTX 3050 Ti GPU offers slightly better graphics performance than the Acer's RTX 3050, which is very important for these use cases.
Build Quality
7.6/10
7.2/10
The Acer Swift X 16 and ASUS TUF Gaming F17 both have good build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Acer Swift X 16 and the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 compare to other laptops
"Acer’s Swift X 16 is an excellent choice for shoppers who want a 16-inch laptop and care more for performance than attractive design or long battery life. The Swift X 16’s gorgeous OLED display, spacious keyboard, and big touchpad make it pleasant to use in basic day-to-day tasks. It also has an AMD Ryzen 9 processor and Nvidia RTX 4050 graphics, which combine to deliver good performance in a wide variety of productivity applications and games. A few minor mistakes, like poorly-placed USB-C ports that lack DisplayPort, will turn off some shoppers, but those who can accept its shortcomings will find the Swift X 16 a versatile daily driver."
"One of the Asus TUF Gaming F17’s highlights is without a doubt its excellent gaming performance. The fact that Asus configured the RTX 3060 GPU for its specified maximum of 140 W is became immediately noticeable in our benchmarks. For a 17-inch notebook the F17 also offers a very long battery life, which makes it somewhat portable. On the flip side is the display. It may be saved by its good overall contrast ratio, but its overall brightness is simply too low, and its response times are too slow for a gaming device. The F17’s successor needs to improve upon this."
Get a great deal on the Acer Swift X 16 or the ASUS TUF Gaming F17
About Acer
Acer is a prominent Taiwanese electronics brand which makes a wide range of laptops, with multiple product lines catering to personal use, gaming, and business use. They are renowned for having exceptional value for money, as they frequently offer good specifications at a lower price than other manufacturers.
About ASUS
ASUS, a Taiwanese electronics brand, is one of the largest personal computer vendor by market share. The majority of their laptops are targeted towards personal use or gaming. Their most popular product lines include the budget-friendly VivoBook, more premium ZenBook, and their TUF and ROG gaming laptops, the latter of which has a reputation for excellent gaming performance.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
132,195
Recommendations made
28,643
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.