The ASUS TUF Gaming F17, being a gaming laptop, is tailored for performance and features a larger screen and dedicated graphics suitable for intensive tasks, including gaming, but is heavier and less portable. The ASUS Vivobook 16X, while also capable of handling demanding applications, has a better balance of portability, including a lighter weight and longer battery life, and also offers a higher resolution screen with better color coverage, making it a good fit for multimedia and general productivity. Both laptops are similarly priced, so your choice depends on whether you prioritize gaming performance or a blend of mobility and screen quality. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the ASUS TUF Gaming F17
The ASUS TUF Gaming F17 has no clear advantages over the ASUS Vivobook 16X.
Advantages of the ASUS Vivobook 16X
Very good for engineering and design
Good for gaming and AI
Good for software development
Good overall display quality
Good portability
Best in class speakers
Key differences
General Use
7.1/10
7.6/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1200
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
264.0 nits
DISPLAY BRIGHTNESS
300.0 nits
4.5 Hours
BATTERY LIFE
5.0 Hours
7.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.5/10
6.4/10
PORTABILITY SCORE
7.5/10
The ASUS Vivobook 16X and ASUS TUF Gaming F17 are both good for general use, though the ASUS Vivobook 16X is somewhat better.
The ASUS Vivobook 16X is rated higher for general use because it has a more powerful processor, double the RAM for better multitasking, and a higher-quality screen with better color coverage and brightness, which makes for a more enjoyable viewing experience. Additionally, despite its large screen, it maintains good portability with a lighter weight and a longer battery life, whereas the ASUS TUF Gaming F17, though offering a solid gaming experience with a high-refresh-rate display and dedicated GPU, is heavier and has a shorter battery life, making it less ideal for on-the-go use.
Gaming and AI
6.6/10
7.7/10
5.2/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.5/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1200
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
120Hz
Yes
SUPPORTS DLSS
Yes
No
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
Yes
7.5/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
7.5/10
The ASUS Vivobook 16X is good for gaming and AI, while the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 is only fair.
The ASUS Vivobook 16X offers greater gaming and 3D capabilities due to its superior Nvidia RTX 4060 graphics card, which is significantly more powerful than the RTX 3050 Ti found in the ASUS TUF Gaming F17; however, despite a lower screen refresh rate, it still maintains high screen quality, favoring overall performance over screen fluidity.
Engineering and Design
6.9/10
8.2/10
6.2/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.0/10
5.2/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
8.5/10
8.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
The ASUS Vivobook 16X is very good for engineering and design, while the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 is only fair.
The ASUS Vivobook 16X is considered very good for engineering and design use because it has a more powerful processor, double the amount of RAM for smooth multitasking, and a superior GPU that can handle intensive graphics tasks better than the ASUS TUF Gaming F17. Additionally, the Vivobook 16X's screen displays colors more accurately and has higher brightness, making it better for design work where color precision is key; these advantages come at the cost of the Vivobook being less portable compared to the Gaming F17.
Content Creation
7.1/10
7.7/10
6.2/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.0/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1200
8.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
The ASUS Vivobook 16X and ASUS TUF Gaming F17 are both good for content creation, though the ASUS Vivobook 16X is somewhat better.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
6.7/10
7.4/10
6.2/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
9.0/10
8.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1200
7.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.5/10
The ASUS Vivobook 16X is good for software development, while the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 is only fair.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Screen Quality
6.9/10
7.3/10
17.3in
SIZE
16.0in
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1200
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
120Hz
264.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
300.0 nits
The ASUS Vivobook 16X has a better screen than the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, content creation, and software development.
The ASUS TUF Gaming F17 may offer satisfactory resolution and brightness for everyday tasks and decent panel technology, but it lacks the color accuracy and wider color gamuts like DCI-P3 and Adobe RGB necessary for precise engineering and design work. The ASUS Vivobook 16X, on the other hand, likely has a display with good color reproduction and sufficient resolution and brightness, making it suitable for general use and visually demanding engineering and design applications. However, neither laptop is ideal for gaming and 3D due to lower refresh rates, which are crucial for smooth motion and a responsive experience in fast-paced visual environments.
Portability
Fair
Good
17.3in
SIZE
16.0in
5.7 lbs
WEIGHT
4.2 lbs
0.9in
THICKNESS
0.7in
The ASUS Vivobook 16X has good portability, while the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 has only fair portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
"One of the Asus TUF Gaming F17’s highlights is without a doubt its excellent gaming performance. The fact that Asus configured the RTX 3060 GPU for its specified maximum of 140 W is became immediately noticeable in our benchmarks. For a 17-inch notebook the F17 also offers a very long battery life, which makes it somewhat portable. On the flip side is the display. It may be saved by its good overall contrast ratio, but its overall brightness is simply too low, and its response times are too slow for a gaming device. The F17’s successor needs to improve upon this."
"I think the ASUS Vivobook 16X is fantastic. Great performance, decent battery life, good keyboard and trackpad, and a massive screen – just that the screen quality itself is kinda subpar. If you’re okay with the screen, then I think this is an okay laptop. However, I’d like to see a price drop."
Get a great deal on the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 or the ASUS Vivobook 16X
About ASUS
ASUS, a Taiwanese electronics brand, is one of the largest personal computer vendor by market share. The majority of their laptops are targeted towards personal use or gaming. Their most popular product lines include the budget-friendly VivoBook, more premium ZenBook, and their TUF and ROG gaming laptops, the latter of which has a reputation for excellent gaming performance.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
124,695
Recommendations made
27,018
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.