Choosing between the Acer Swift 14 and the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 depends on your priority between portability and gaming performance. The Acer Swift 14 is more portable with a lighter weight and higher portability score, better suited for general use and offers a higher-resolution display with touchscreen. The ASUS TUF Gaming F17, despite being heavier and less portable, is equipped with a dedicated graphics card, making it a better fit for gaming and graphic-intensive tasks. It also comes at an often somewhat less expensive price-point. Consider the Acer for on-the-go productivity with a better screen and the ASUS for gaming and demanding graphical work within a tighter budget. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer Swift 14
Very good for general use
Good for engineering and design
Very good for software development
Very good for content creation
Good overall display quality
Excellent portability
Good battery life
Advantages of the ASUS TUF Gaming F17
Good speakers
Key differences
General Use
8.2/10
7.1/10
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
458.0 nits
DISPLAY BRIGHTNESS
264.0 nits
9.0 Hours
BATTERY LIFE
4.5 Hours
7.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.0/10
9.0/10
PORTABILITY SCORE
6.4/10
The Acer Swift 14 is very good for general use, while the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 is good.
PerfectRec’s General Use Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for general productivity, web browsing, streaming, video calls, and running a wide variety of apps and programs.
Engineering and Design
7.9/10
6.9/10
9.0/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
6.2/10
3.8/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
5.2/10
16.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
The Acer Swift 14 is good for engineering and design, while the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 is only fair.
The Acer Swift 14 offers strong performance for engineering and design, thanks to its higher-end CPU, more RAM, and a superior screen with better resolution and color accuracy, which is ideal for detail-oriented work; however, it trades off gaming capabilities given its integrated GPU. In contrast, the ASUS TUF Gaming F17, with a dedicated high-performance GPU and a screen with a higher refresh rate, is well-suited for engineering tasks that require graphics processing power, but it is heavier and less portable, with a lower resolution screen that impacts fine detail work.
Content Creation
8.2/10
7.1/10
9.0/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
6.2/10
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
16.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
The Acer Swift 14 is very good for content creation, while the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 is good.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
8.2/10
6.7/10
9.0/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
6.2/10
16.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
7.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.0/10
The Acer Swift 14 is very good for software development, while the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 is only fair.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Screen Quality
7.6/10
6.9/10
14.0in
SIZE
17.3in
2560 x 1600
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
458.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
264.0 nits
The Acer Swift 14 has a better screen than the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 for general use, engineering and design, software development, and content creation.
For general use, the Acer Swift 14 shines with clarity and brightness, making text and images crisp and comfortable to view, while the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 offers a decent display that is less vibrant. For engineering and design professionals, the Swift 14 presents colors more accurately, covering a wider range of color gamuts which is vital for precision work, whereas the TUF F17 might not represent colors as faithfully. When it comes to 3D tasks, the lower refresh rate of the Swift 14 can make motion less smooth compared to gaming laptops, and while the TUF F17 doesn't excel in this area either, it's geared more towards gamers who may find it marginally better for fast-paced visuals.
Battery
9.0 Hours
4.5 Hours
The Acer Swift 14 has 9 hours of battery life. The ASUS TUF Gaming F17 has 4.5 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Excellent
Fair
14.0in
SIZE
17.3in
2.6 lbs
WEIGHT
5.7 lbs
0.5in
THICKNESS
0.9in
The Acer Swift 14 has excellent portability, while the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 has only fair portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Cost
$1,400
$1,000
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
The Acer Swift 14 has a price of $1,400 and the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 costs $1,000.
The Acer Swift 14 and ASUS TUF Gaming F17 are both only fair for gaming and AI.
The Acer Swift 14, with its lower-end integrated graphics, is less suitable for gaming compared to the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 which has a dedicated NVIDIA graphics card that provides better performance for gaming and 3D applications; moreover, the ASUS model offers a higher screen refresh rate which is beneficial for smoother gameplay, whereas the Acer's refresh rate is standard and less ideal for fast-paced gaming despite its higher resolution and quality display.
Build Quality
7.4/10
7.2/10
The Acer Swift 14 and ASUS TUF Gaming F17 both have good build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Acer Swift 14 and the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 compare to other laptops
Olivier Martin, Ryan Lim, John Peroramas | April 2023
"The Acer Swift 14 is good for school use. Its compact design makes it easy to carry around, and its battery lasts easily through a typical school day. You can configure the laptop with an FHD+ or QHD+ display; both look sharp and get bright enough to combat glare. The keyboard feels tactile but can be a little tiring to type on over an extended period, and while the touchpad is small, it's responsive to all movements and gestures. Its Intel 13th Gen. CPU can handle nearly every type of workload; however, its integrated graphics perform poorly, so it isn't ideal for students in technical fields like 3D graphics."
"One of the Asus TUF Gaming F17’s highlights is without a doubt its excellent gaming performance. The fact that Asus configured the RTX 3060 GPU for its specified maximum of 140 W is became immediately noticeable in our benchmarks. For a 17-inch notebook the F17 also offers a very long battery life, which makes it somewhat portable. On the flip side is the display. It may be saved by its good overall contrast ratio, but its overall brightness is simply too low, and its response times are too slow for a gaming device. The F17’s successor needs to improve upon this."
Get a great deal on the Acer Swift 14 or the ASUS TUF Gaming F17
About Acer
Acer is a prominent Taiwanese electronics brand which makes a wide range of laptops, with multiple product lines catering to personal use, gaming, and business use. They are renowned for having exceptional value for money, as they frequently offer good specifications at a lower price than other manufacturers.
About ASUS
ASUS, a Taiwanese electronics brand, is one of the largest personal computer vendor by market share. The majority of their laptops are targeted towards personal use or gaming. Their most popular product lines include the budget-friendly VivoBook, more premium ZenBook, and their TUF and ROG gaming laptops, the latter of which has a reputation for excellent gaming performance.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
130,995
Recommendations made
28,383
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.