The LG 32GQ850 is an excellent pick if you're into competitive gaming due to its higher refresh rate and quick response time. However, it's not the best for HDR gaming or media with its limited brightness capabilities. Meanwhile, the LG 34WQ75C is less suited for competitive gaming due to a lower refresh rate, but its larger, ultra-wide screen may offer a more immersive experience for media consumption and productivity, with more screen real estate for multitasking. The decision hinges on whether you prioritize gaming performance or a broader, more vivid display for work and watching content. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 32GQ850 (IPS)
Very good refresh rate
Advantages of the LG 34WQ75C (IPS)
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Very good response time
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
5.2/10
3.8/10
260Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
8.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
5.0 ms
48 - 260 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
150 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The LG 32GQ850 (IPS) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is somewhat better.
Productivity
5.0/10
6.0/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
93 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
5.3/10
5.9/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
150 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34WQ75C (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are both poor for media consumption, though the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is somewhat better.
Cost
$718
$600
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
The LG 32GQ850 (IPS) has a price of $718 and the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) costs $600.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
5.8/10
5.8/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
260Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
150 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
98.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
85.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34WQ75C (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) and the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.