If you prioritize an immersive gaming and media experience with deep blacks and vibrant colors, and don't mind a higher price, the Acer X34V with its QD-OLED panel is a strong choice. It's particularly good for games and movies in a dark room. However, if competitive gaming and productivity are more important to you, and you prefer a faster refresh rate and a sharper image for static content like text, the LG 32GQ850 with its IPS panel could be better, even though it doesn't offer as rich a color experience or contrast as the Acer. Keep in mind, the LG doesn't support HDR content as well as the Acer does. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer X34V (QD-OLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Best in class for media consumption
Good image clarity
Best in class contrast
Best in class color volume
Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 32GQ850 (IPS)
Very good refresh rate
Key differences
Casual Gaming
9.6/10
5.8/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
260Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
150 nits
1000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
5.7/10
5.0/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are both poor for productivity, though the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is somewhat better.
Media Consumption
9.5/10
5.3/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
150 nits
1000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is poor.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Competitive Gaming
5.2/10
5.2/10
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
260Hz
1.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.0 ms
48 - 175 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 260 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
150 nits
The LG 32GQ850 (IPS) and Acer X34V (QD-OLED) are both poor for competitive gaming.
Cost
$700
$718
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) has a price of $700 and the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) costs $718.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
125,600
Recommendations made
18,840
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.