A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
X34V
Company ProductName Specs




32GQ850
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 12, 2024·

If you prioritize an immersive gaming and media experience with deep blacks and vibrant colors, and don't mind a higher price, the Acer X34V with its QD-OLED panel is a strong choice. It's particularly good for games and movies in a dark room. However, if competitive gaming and productivity are more important to you, and you prefer a faster refresh rate and a sharper image for static content like text, the LG 32GQ850 with its IPS panel could be better, even though it doesn't offer as rich a color experience or contrast as the Acer. Keep in mind, the LG doesn't support HDR content as well as the Acer does. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer X34V (QD-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Good image clarity
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class color volume
  • Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 32GQ850 (IPS)
  • Very good refresh rate

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.6
X34V
32GQ850
5.8
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
260Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
150 nits
1000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is poor.

Productivity

5.7
X34V
32GQ850
5.0
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are both poor for productivity, though the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

9.5
X34V
32GQ850
5.3
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
150 nits
1000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is poor.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
X34V
32GQ850
No
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Print Photo Editing

No
X34V
32GQ850
Yes
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

5.2
X34V
32GQ850
5.2
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
260Hz
1.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.0 ms
48 - 175 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 260 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
150 nits
The LG 32GQ850 (IPS) and Acer X34V (QD-OLED) are both poor for competitive gaming.

Cost

$700
X34V
32GQ850
$718
Product imageProduct image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) has a price of $700 and the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) costs $718.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
X34V
32GQ850
Yes
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
X34V
32GQ850
No
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Acer X34V (QD-OLED)LG 32GQ850 (IPS)
Acer X34V (QD-OLED)LG 32GQ850 (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$700
$718
Screen Size
34"32"
Resolution
3440 x 14402560 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDLED
Screen Sub-type
QD-OLEDIPS
Local Dimming Zones
N/A16

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
250 nits150 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
1000 nits600 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesNo
sRGB Color Gamut
104 %135 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1 ms8 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 175 Hz48 - 260 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
7.2/108.3/10
Ghosting Score
9.6/107.6/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
109 PPI93 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.6/106.3/10
Image Clarity Score
7/106.3/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
10
HDMI 2.1 Ports
01
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,300
Recommendations made
17,445
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo