For a sharper image and higher resolution for detailed work or high-definition gaming, the Asus VG28UQL1A with its 4K resolution is a solid choice. The smaller size and higher pixels per inch will lead to clearer text and images. However, if you prefer an immersive experience with a wider field of view for multitasking or enjoy the cinematic aspect ratio for movies, the LG 34WQ75C, with its ultrawide screen, could be more appealing. As for gaming, Asus offers a higher refresh rate and lower total response time, making it better suited for fast-paced games, whereas LG's lower refresh rate and longer response time may not be ideal for competitive gaming. Neither is well-suited for HDR gaming or media, but both are capable of decent color reproduction for general use or casual photo editing. If you require USB power delivery or more USB ports for connectivity, the LG provides these extras. Consider your primary activities: sharpness and gaming performance favor the Asus, while immersive experiences and connectivity options lean towards the LG. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS)
Good for casual gaming
Very good for productivity
Good for media consumption
Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 34WQ75C (IPS)
The LG 34WQ75C (IPS) has no clear advantages over the Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS).
Key differences
Casual Gaming
7.2/10
5.8/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
350 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
90.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
85.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) is good for casual gaming, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is poor.
Competitive Gaming
6.1/10
3.8/10
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
5.0 ms
48 - 144 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
8.8/10
6.0/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
157 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) is very good for productivity, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is only fair.
Media Consumption
7.0/10
5.9/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
350 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) is good for media consumption, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is poor.
Key similarities
Cost
$611
$600
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
The Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) has a price of $611 and the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) costs $600.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are not suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) and the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) compare to other monitors
"The Asus TUF Gaming VG28UQL1A is, in many ways, a great 4K gaming monitor. It has a sharp, accurate image with good contrast and excellent motion clarity. Luminance uniformity is its only weakness. The monitor’s $799 MSRP is relatively affordable for a 4K HDMI 2.1 monitor, as well."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,300
Recommendations made
17,445
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.