If you prioritize a larger screen and 4K resolution for detailed work or high-resolution media consumption, the Asus PA329CV could serve you well. However, it has limitations for gaming due to its lower refresh rate and response times. On the other hand, if you prefer an ultrawide display, which can be more immersive for media and provide more horizontal space for productivity tasks, the LG 34WQ75C could be a better option. Keep in mind the LG's resolution is lower than 4K, which might affect the sharpness of content but could still offer a satisfactory experience overall, especially when it comes to multitasking with its aspect ratio. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA329CV (IPS)
Good for productivity
Advantages of the LG 34WQ75C (IPS)
Very good response time
Key differences
Productivity
7.7/10
6.0/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
137 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is good for productivity, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is only fair.
Media Consumption
6.5/10
5.9/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$529
$600
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) has a price of $529 and the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) costs $600.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
5.8/10
5.8/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
80.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
85.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PA329CV (IPS) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.
Competitive Gaming
3.8/10
3.8/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
15.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
5.0 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The LG 34WQ75C (IPS) and Asus PA329CV (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus PA329CV (IPS) and the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.