A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·
The LG 32GP850 is better suited for gaming with a higher refresh rate, which reduces motion blur and makes for smoother gameplay. It also has variable refresh rate support to reduce screen tearing. Its higher peak brightness and better contrast make it more suitable for gaming and media consumption in various lighting conditions. On the other hand, the LG 34WQ75C offers a wider screen with a 21:9 aspect ratio which can enhance productivity by providing more screen real estate for multitasking and immersive media consumption but has a lower refresh rate which is less ideal for competitive gaming. If cost is a major factor and gaming performance is a priority, the LG 32GP850 is a good choice. If you're focused on productivity and prefer a wider screen, and don't mind spending more, the LG 34WQ75C could be the better option, though it won't be as good for fast-paced gaming. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 32GP850 (IPS)
- Good refresh rate
- Good brightness
Advantages of the LG 34WQ75C (IPS)
- Good text clarity
- Good image clarity
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
4.8
3.8
180Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
6.2 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
5.0 ms
20 - 180 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
412 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is somewhat better.
Productivity
5.0
6.0
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
93 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
No
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
5.8
5.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
180Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1037:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
412 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
430 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
95.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
85.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.
Media Consumption
5.5
5.9
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1037:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
412 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
430 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34WQ75C (IPS) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are both poor for media consumption.
Cost
$600
$600
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
The LG 32GP850 (IPS) has a price of $600 and the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) costs $600.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the LG 32GP850 (IPS) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the LG 32GP850 (IPS) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG 32GP850 (IPS) and the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) compare to other monitors
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| LG 32GP850 (IPS) | LG 34WQ75C (IPS) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$600 | $600 | ||
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 32" | 34" | |
Resolution | |||
Resolution | 2560 x 1440 | 3440 x 1440 | |
Screen Type | |||
Screen Type | LED | LED | |
Screen Sub-type | |||
Screen Sub-type | IPS | IPS | |
Refresh Rate | |||
Refresh Rate | 180Hz | 60Hz | |
COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Native Contrast | |||
Native Contrast | 1037:1 | 1000:1 | |
SDR Peak Brightness | |||
SDR Peak Brightness | 412 nits | 300 nits | |
HDR Peak Brightness | |||
HDR Peak Brightness | 430 nits | Unknown | |
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | |||
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | No | No | |
sRGB Color Gamut | |||
sRGB Color Gamut | 100 % | 99 % | |
MOTION CHARACTERISTICS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Total Response Time | |||
Total Response Time | 6.2 ms | 5 ms | |
Variable Refresh Rate | |||
Variable Refresh Rate | 20 - 180 Hz | N/A | |
Strobing / BFI | |||
Strobing / BFI | Yes | No | |
Persistence Blur Score | |||
Persistence Blur Score | 7.3/10 | 5/10 | |
Ghosting Score | |||
Ghosting Score | 8/10 | 8.2/10 | |
TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Pixels Per Inch | |||
Pixels Per Inch | 93 PPI | 110 PPI | |
Coating | |||
Coating | Matte | Matte | |
Text Clarity Score | |||
Text Clarity Score | 6.3/10 | 7.1/10 | |
Image Clarity Score | |||
Image Clarity Score | 6.3/10 | 7.1/10 | |
PORTS & CONNECTIVITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
HDMI 1.4 Ports | |||
HDMI 1.4 Ports | 1 | 0 | |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 2 | 2 | |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
Micro HDMI Ports | |||
Micro HDMI Ports | 0 | 0 | |
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | |||
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
More comparisons for you
Compare LG 32GP850 (IPS) vs. BenQ XL2566K (TN)
VS
Compare LG 32GP850 (IPS) vs. Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS)
VS
Compare LG 32GP850 (IPS) vs. Gigabyte M32U (IPS)
VS
Compare LG 34WQ75C (IPS) vs. Gigabyte M32UC (VA)
VS
Compare LG 34WQ75C (IPS) vs. Dell U2723QE (IPS Black)
VS
Compare LG 34WQ75C (IPS) vs. Asus PA329CV (IPS)
VS
FAQs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
125,900
Recommendations made
18,885
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Featured in
