A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
27GR95QL
Company ProductName Specs




34WQ75C
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

If you prioritize competitive gaming and are willing to invest in a premium monitor, the LG 27GR95QL with its higher refresh rate and shorter response time could enhance your gaming experience. Its OLED technology offers deep blacks and high contrast, suitable for HDR gaming and media. However, for everyday productivity and digital photo editing, the larger screen and wider aspect ratio of the LG 34WQ75C may be more beneficial, and its IPS panel provides good color accuracy and image clarity, while also being more affordable. Neither monitor is optimal for HDR video editing, but if print photo editing is a requirement, the 27GR95QL has a slight edge. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Best in class for competitive gaming
  • Very good for media consumption
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Best in class contrast
  • Good brightness
  • Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 34WQ75C (IPS)
  • Good text clarity
  • Good image clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.8
27GR95QL
34WQ75C
5.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
600 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
85.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

9.6
27GR95QL
34WQ75C
3.8
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
0.3 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
5.0 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
600 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is poor.

Media Consumption

8.2
27GR95QL
34WQ75C
5.9
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
600 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) is very good for media consumption, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$992
27GR95QL
34WQ75C
$600
Product image
Product image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

The LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) has a price of $992 and the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) costs $600.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
27GR95QL
34WQ75C
No
The LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
27GR95QL
34WQ75C
No
The LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

No
27GR95QL
34WQ75C
Yes
The LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Productivity

5.8
27GR95QL
34WQ75C
6.0
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
108 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG 34WQ75C (IPS) to be only fair for productivity, while the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) is poor.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
27GR95QL
34WQ75C
No
Both the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) and the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED)LG 34WQ75C (IPS)
LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED)LG 34WQ75C (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$992
$600
Screen Size
27"34"
Resolution
2560 x 14403440 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDIPS
Refresh Rate
240Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
600 nits300 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesNo
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %99 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.3 ms5 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 240 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/105/10
Ghosting Score
9.9/108.2/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
108 PPI110 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.6/107.1/10
Image Clarity Score
7/107.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
02
HDMI 2.1 Ports
20
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,900
Recommendations made
16,185
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo