The LG 27GR95QE offers superior HDR gaming and media consumption with its higher SDR and HDR peak brightness, making it an excellent choice for dark room viewing. It also has better color volume and image clarity, ensuring vibrant and accurate colors across various content. However, it falls short in casual gaming due to its lack of VRR support and higher chance of permanent burn-in, which could be a concern if you plan to display static elements for extended periods.
On the other hand, the LG 27GR95QL is more versatile for gaming, with a wider VRR range that enhances the gaming experience by reducing screen tearing. It's also more suitable for well-lit rooms with its higher peak brightness in SDR, although its HDR peak brightness is unknown. The 27GR95QL has a faster total response time, resulting in less motion blur, which is crucial for competitive gaming. However, it has a lower color volume and slightly lower image clarity compared to the 27GR95QE.
In summary, choose the LG 27GR95QE for an exceptional HDR experience in a controlled lighting environment, but be mindful of the burn-in risk. Opt for the LG 27GR95QL if you prioritize gaming versatility, especially in a brighter room, and are less concerned with the ultimate HDR performance. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED)
Good image clarity
Advantages of the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED)
Best in class for competitive gaming
Very good for media consumption
Good brightness
Best in class response time
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
8.3/10
9.6/10
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
3.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.3 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
196 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
The LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) is very good.
Media Consumption
7.5/10
8.2/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
196 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
656 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) is very good for media consumption, while the LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) is good.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
9.5/10
9.8/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
196 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
656 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
72.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) and LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.
Productivity
5.8/10
5.8/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
111 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
108 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) and LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) are both poor for productivity.
Cost
$1,000
$992
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
The LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) has a price of $1,000 and the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) costs $992.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
Yes
Both the LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) and LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) and LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) and LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) and LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG 27GR95QE (W-OLED) and the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) compare to other monitors
"The LG 27GR95QE-B is a stellar display that makes 1440p again the PC gaming sweet spot due to its high 240Hz refresh rate and fantastic latency. However, its low overall brightness and lack of onboard settings keep it from being great."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,300
Recommendations made
17,445
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.