A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated 24 hours ago |
Report incorrect information
32Q1U
27GR95QL

What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024· Prices updated 24 hours ago

If you prioritize a larger screen and sharper image for productivity and media consumption, the Innocn 32Q1U with its higher screen resolution could be a better fit. However, for competitive gamers seeking high refresh rates and the lowest possible response times, the LG 27GR95QL will deliver a smoother and more responsive gaming experience. Both have excellent contrast and are suitable for HDR gaming and media, but the LG might not be as great for tasks that require detailed color work like photo editing, which the Innocn handles better due to its wider color gamut coverage. Give Feedback

At the time of writing the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) cost $1,000 and the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) cost $992.

Advantages of the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Good image clarity
Advantages of the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for competitive gaming
  • Very good refresh rate

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

4.7
32Q1U
27GR95QL
9.6
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
0.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.3 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
540 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
The LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) is poor.

Productivity

6.8
32Q1U
27GR95QL
5.8
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
139 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
108 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) is only fair for productivity, while the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

9.5
32Q1U
27GR95QL
8.2
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
540 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) is very good.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
32Q1U
27GR95QL
No
The Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing while the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.7
32Q1U
27GR95QL
9.8
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
540 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) and Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Cost

$1,000
32Q1U
27GR95QL
$992
Product imageProduct image

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

The Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) has a price of $1,000 and the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) costs $992.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
32Q1U
27GR95QL
Yes
Both the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) and LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
32Q1U
27GR95QL
Yes
Both the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) and LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
32Q1U
27GR95QL
No
Both the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) and LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED) and the LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down
VS
Casual Gaming Score
Price
6
7
8
9
10
     0
   500
  1000
  1500
  2000
  2500
  3000
  3500
A
B

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED)LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED)
Innocn 32Q1U (W-OLED)LG 27GR95QL (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,000
$992
Screen Size
32"27"
Resolution
3840 x 21602560 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
60Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
540 nits600 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
Unknown100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.1 ms0.3 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A48 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/108/10
Ghosting Score
10/109.9/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
139 PPI108 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.9/106.6/10
Image Clarity Score
7.9/107/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
10

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
165,200
Recommendations made
24,780
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo