If you prioritize battery life and performance for general use and engineering tasks, the XPG Xenia 14 is a superior choice, offering higher RAM and a faster processor, which are beneficial for intensive tasks. However, it comes at a higher cost. The Gateway 14.1" is more budget-friendly, but its performance is limited by lower RAM and a basic processor, making it suitable for basic tasks. Despite its affordability, it may not handle demanding applications well. The XPG also has a better build quality and port selection, and its keyboard is rated higher in quality. For gaming, neither is ideal, but the XPG's better graphics will perform somewhat better. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Gateway 14.1"
The Gateway 14.1" has no clear advantages over the XPG Xenia 14.
Advantages of the XPG Xenia 14
Good for general use
Good for software development
Good for content creation
Good overall build quality
Excellent portability
Very good battery life
Good speakers
Very good keyboard
Key differences
General Use
5.6/10
7.3/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1200
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
208.0 nits
DISPLAY BRIGHTNESS
321.0 nits
8.0 Hours
BATTERY LIFE
10.0 Hours
5.3/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
8.0/10
8.0/10
PORTABILITY SCORE
9.2/10
The XPG Xenia 14 is good for general use, while the Gateway 14.1" is poor.
The Gateway 14.1" has lower performance due to its basic CPU and less RAM, which together with its lower screen quality and weaker battery life, make it less suitable for general use than the XPG Xenia 14, which offers a more powerful CPU, more RAM, higher resolution and screen brightness, and longer battery life, resulting in an overall better user experience. Additionally, the XPG Xenia 14's higher portability score suggests it's lighter and easier to carry, and its better keyboard and speaker quality enhance everyday usability, further delineating it as a better choice for general use tasks.
Gaming and AI
5.4/10
6.1/10
3.5/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
3.6/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1200
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
No
SUPPORTS DLSS
No
No
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
No
7.0/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
7.0/10
The XPG Xenia 14 is only fair for gaming and AI, while the Gateway 14.1" is poor.
The Gateway 14.1" is less suited for gaming and 3D applications, with a basic Intel Celeron processor and integrated UHD Graphics which cannot keep up with the demands of modern games and 3D software, while the XPG Xenia 14, featuring a stronger Intel i5 processor and more capable Intel Iris Xe graphics, is better at handling such tasks even though neither excels in these areas. Both laptops share a similar screen refresh rate and IPS panel type, which are fine for general use but might not satisfy hardcore gamers or professionals who prefer high refresh rate screens and superior screen quality to match their hardware's capabilities.
Engineering and Design
5.5/10
6.8/10
3.3/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
4.9/10
3.5/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
3.6/10
4.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
The XPG Xenia 14 is only fair for engineering and design, while the Gateway 14.1" is poor.
The Gateway 14.1" has a less powerful Intel Celeron processor and basic Intel UHD Graphics which are not suitable for demanding engineering and design tasks, while the XPG Xenia 14 comes with a robust Intel i5 processor and superior Iris Xe graphics, making it well-equipped for such intensive use. Additionally, the XPG Xenia 14 features a higher-resolution display and more RAM, both critical for sophisticated engineering and design applications that require detailed visuals and the ability to handle multiple tasks at once.
Content Creation
5.8/10
7.4/10
3.3/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
4.9/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1200
4.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
The XPG Xenia 14 is good for content creation, while the Gateway 14.1" is poor.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
5.8/10
7.2/10
3.3/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
4.9/10
4.0 GB
RAM
16.0 GB
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1200
5.3/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
8.0/10
The XPG Xenia 14 is good for software development, while the Gateway 14.1" is poor.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Screen Quality
6.0/10
6.9/10
14.1in
SIZE
14.0in
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1200
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
208.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
321.0 nits
The XPG Xenia 14 has a better screen than the Gateway 14.1" for general use, gaming and AI, engineering and design, content creation, and software development.
Choosing the Gateway 14.1" for general tasks offers an adequately clear display, but the lower resolution and brightness may not be ideal for all environments or for detail-oriented design work. Conversely, the XPG Xenia 14 provides a more vivid and sharp display suitable for detailed engineering and design due to its superior color accuracy and range. However, for gaming and 3D applications, neither laptop is optimal as both lack high refresh rates necessary for smooth visuals, but they can still be used for casual play or entry-level 3D tasks.
Battery
8.0 Hours
10.0 Hours
The Gateway 14.1" has 8 hours of battery life. The XPG Xenia 14 has 10 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Very Good
Excellent
14.1in
SIZE
14.0in
3.3 lbs
WEIGHT
2.2 lbs
0.7in
THICKNESS
0.5in
The XPG Xenia 14 has excellent portability, while the Gateway 14.1" has very good portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Build Quality
5.1/10
7.2/10
The XPG Xenia 14 has good build quality, while the Gateway 14.1" has poor build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Cost
$99
$800
$0
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
The Gateway 14.1" has a price of $99 and the XPG Xenia 14 costs $800.
"The Gateway Ultra Slim 14" is surprisingly quiet with long battery life. The inexpensive Gateway excels at maximizing performance per dollar with lots of RAM and storage, super-quiet fan, and a long battery life. It can even house up to two M.2 SSDs which we weren't expecting from such a cheap system. However, the iffy reliability of the keyboard and USB-C port on our test unit means users should double-check for these potential issues immediately after purchasing."
"The Xenia 14 is a top 14-inch laptop under 1 kg. ADATA isn't exactly known for its laptops and so we weren't expecting much from its first 14-inch Ultrabook. With that said, we're pleasantly surprised by how well the Xenia 14 looks and performs. Not only is it incredibly light, but it has a color accurate 16:10 display, high CPU and GPU performance, easy RAM and SSD serviceability, plenty of port options including Thunderbolt 4, and long battery life. It packs a lot of punch and features considering the size and weight to be better than even the LG Gram series."
Get a great deal on the Gateway 14.1" or the XPG Xenia 14
About Gateway
Gateway is a laptop and tablet brand owned by Acer which sells budget-friendly laptops exclusively through Walmart. It was previously an American computer company until its acquisition by Acer in 2007, who then revived the brand in 2020. Gateway laptops are manufactured by Chinese company Shenzhen Bmorn Technology, which also makes EVOO-branded models.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
98,595
Recommendations made
21,363
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.