ASUS Vivobook 16X vs Dell Inspiron 14 5420

PerfectRec’s Gaming and AI Score strongly emphasizes graphics processing capability, while also taking into account other factors that impact suitability for gaming and AI work.

The ASUS Vivobook 16X excels in engineering and design tasks due to its more powerful Intel i7-13700H CPU and Nvidia RTX 4060 GPU, contributing to better performance in complex computations and 3D rendering, coupled with an excellent screen that boasts high color accuracy and a comfortable 16:10 aspect ratio. In comparison, the Dell Inspiron 14 5420, while also suitable for engineering and design with its capable Intel i7-1255U CPU and Nvidia MX570 GPU, offers superior portability owing to its lighter weight and a smaller form factor, along with a higher-resolution display, though it may not match the raw performance of the Vivobook.

The ASUS Vivobook 16X's larger and higher resolution display offers a clear and vivid viewing experience for general tasks and detailed work in engineering, complemented by good color accuracy essential for design work. However, its lower refresh rate makes it less suitable for 3D applications and gaming, where fluid motion is key. The Dell Inspiron 14 5420, with a smaller screen and decent resolution, provides an adequate experience for everyday tasks and some technical work, but it lacks the superior color range designers need and the smoothness gamers seek due to an average refresh rate.

Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.

The ASUS Vivobook 16X offers strong performance with a robust CPU and ample RAM, a bright, high-contrast screen good for various lighting conditions, and a larger screen size which enhances multitasking but has average battery life and more heft which affects portability. Conversely, the Dell Inspiron 14 5420, while also equipped with a capable CPU and ample RAM, prioritizes portability with a lighter build and longer battery life but settles for a smaller display and less powerful graphics which may limit its use in graphics-intensive tasks. Both laptops provide good keyboard and speaker qualities and manage heat and noise well, making them versatile for general use.

PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.

PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.

PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.