The Acer Aspire 3 15 is significantly less expensive with adequate performance for general use and has higher battery life, making it suitable for on-the-go tasks. However, the ASUS TUF Gaming F17, while more expensive, offers a larger screen, more storage, and significantly better performance in 3D rendering, machine learning, and intensive gaming thanks to its superior graphics card and processor. It is heavier and has a lower battery life, so it is less portable, but it is better suited for gaming and engineering applications. Both have ample display quality for everyday use but the ASUS may offer better visuals for fast-paced games. The ASUS also includes features beneficial for gaming such as a backlit RGB keyboard and hardware ray tracing. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer Aspire 3 15
Good for software development
Good portability
Good battery life
Advantages of the ASUS TUF Gaming F17
Good for general use
Good overall build quality
Good speakers
Good keyboard
Key differences
Gaming and AI
5.8/10
6.6/10
3.5/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
5.2/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
No
SUPPORTS DLSS
Yes
No
MUX SWITCH / ADVANCED OPTIMUS
No
10.0/10
FAN NOISE SCORE
7.5/10
The ASUS TUF Gaming F17 is only fair for gaming and AI, while the Acer Aspire 3 15 is poor.
The Acer Aspire 3 15 is equipped with an AMD Radeon 610M GPU and a refresh rate of 60Hz, fair for entry-level gaming and basic 3D tasks but may not handle more demanding games and applications smoothly. In comparison, the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 has a more powerful Nvidia RTX 3050 Ti GPU and a higher refresh rate of 144Hz, offering better performance for gaming and more complex 3D work but is less portable due to its larger size and weight.
Engineering and Design
5.9/10
6.9/10
4.1/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
6.2/10
3.5/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
5.2/10
8.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
The ASUS TUF Gaming F17 is only fair for engineering and design, while the Acer Aspire 3 15 is poor.
The ASUS TUF Gaming F17 offers better performance for engineering and design due to its more powerful Intel processor and Nvidia GPU, enabling more demanding tasks and better graphics handling compared to the modest AMD offerings in the Acer Aspire 3 15. The Acer may be quieter and more portable given its lighter build, but its relatively weaker CPU and GPU, and lower screen quality make it less suited to intensive engineering software and detailed design work which the ASUS is equipped to handle better.
Screen Quality
6.2/10
6.9/10
15.6in
SIZE
17.3in
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
244.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
264.0 nits
The Acer Aspire 3 15 has a better screen than the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 for software development, while the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 has a better screen for general use, gaming and AI, and engineering and design.
For general use, the Acer Aspire 3 15's screen has fairness across resolution and brightness, often providing an adequate visual experience, but it may lack the clarity and vibrancy found in higher-end models. In engineering and design, its color gamut coverage isn't wide enough to display the full spectrum of colors needed for precise work, making the screen fair for these tasks. However, for gaming and 3D, the Acer's lower refresh rate leads to a less fluid motion and slower response times, which are crucial in these areas, resulting in a poor quality viewing experience.
Battery
9.5 Hours
4.5 Hours
The Acer Aspire 3 15 has 9.5 hours of battery life. The ASUS TUF Gaming F17 has 4.5 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Good
Fair
15.6in
SIZE
17.3in
3.9 lbs
WEIGHT
5.7 lbs
0.7in
THICKNESS
0.9in
The Acer Aspire 3 15 has good portability, while the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 has only fair portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Build Quality
6.2/10
7.2/10
The ASUS TUF Gaming F17 has good build quality, while the Acer Aspire 3 15 has only fair build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Cost
$330
$1,000
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
The Acer Aspire 3 15 has a price of $330 and the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 costs $1,000.
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers ASUS TUF Gaming F17 to be good for general use, while the Acer Aspire 3 15 is only fair.
The Acer Aspire 3 15 has a more energy-efficient CPU and a fanless design, leading to silent operation, which contributes to its adequacy for general use, yet the smaller storage capacity and lower screen brightness compared to the ASUS might limit its appeal for some users. The ASUS TUF Gaming F17 offers a higher GPU performance suitable for gaming and a larger screen with a high refresh rate, but it's less portable due to its larger size and heavier weight, and its shorter battery life could be a drawback for users needing mobility.
Content Creation
7.0/10
7.1/10
4.1/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
6.2/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
8.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
The ASUS TUF Gaming F17 and Acer Aspire 3 15 are both good for content creation.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
7.0/10
6.7/10
4.1/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
6.2/10
8.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
6.2/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.0/10
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Acer Aspire 3 15 to be good for software development, while the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 is only fair.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Acer Aspire 3 15 and the ASUS TUF Gaming F17 compare to other laptops
Alexander Tozzi, Ryan Lim, and Yannick Khong | March 2023
"The Acer Aspire 3 is okay for school use. It feels reasonably well-built, and it's easy to carry around. The display looks decently sharp and provides plenty of space for multitasking, but it doesn't get bright enough to combat glare. Its Intel Core i3-N305 CPU and integrated graphics can only handle simple tasks, like text processing, web browsing, and video playback, so it isn't ideal for students in more technical fields like 3D graphics. Unfortunately, the battery lasts only around six to seven hours of light use."
"One of the Asus TUF Gaming F17’s highlights is without a doubt its excellent gaming performance. The fact that Asus configured the RTX 3060 GPU for its specified maximum of 140 W is became immediately noticeable in our benchmarks. For a 17-inch notebook the F17 also offers a very long battery life, which makes it somewhat portable. On the flip side is the display. It may be saved by its good overall contrast ratio, but its overall brightness is simply too low, and its response times are too slow for a gaming device. The F17’s successor needs to improve upon this."
Get a great deal on the Acer Aspire 3 15 or the ASUS TUF Gaming F17
About Acer
Acer is a prominent Taiwanese electronics brand which makes a wide range of laptops, with multiple product lines catering to personal use, gaming, and business use. They are renowned for having exceptional value for money, as they frequently offer good specifications at a lower price than other manufacturers.
About ASUS
ASUS, a Taiwanese electronics brand, is one of the largest personal computer vendor by market share. The majority of their laptops are targeted towards personal use or gaming. Their most popular product lines include the budget-friendly VivoBook, more premium ZenBook, and their TUF and ROG gaming laptops, the latter of which has a reputation for excellent gaming performance.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
124,095
Recommendations made
26,888
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.