The LG QNED90 LCD TV offers a higher refresh rate which is excellent for gaming and watching sports, however, it is significantly more expensive and may not provide the same picture quality in dark room environments compared to the OLED technology of the LG A1. In contrast, the LG A1 OLED TV is less costly and will deliver deeper blacks and better viewing angles but has a lower refresh rate making fast-moving content less smooth, and it is not as bright, potentially making it less suitable for very bright rooms. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG QNED90 (LCD)
Good for bright room
Very good for gaming
Advantages of the LG A1 (OLED)
Very good for dark room
Very good for movies & TV
Very good for sports
Very good for cartoons & animation
Very good for use as monitor
Very good for upscaling
Very good motion processing
Very good viewing angle
Very good reflections
Key differences
Picture Quality
7.3/10
8.2/10
5.60/10
CONTRAST
10.00/10
7.4/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
7.1/10
LED FALD
PANEL TYPE
WOLED
IPS
PANEL SUB-TYPE
WBC
The LG A1 (OLED) has very good picture quality, while the LG QNED90 (LCD) has good picture quality.
Movies & TV
6.8/10
8.9/10
5.60/10
CONTRAST
10.00/10
5.3/10
BLACK UNIFORMITY
10.0/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
8.0/10
Yes
HDR10 SUPPORT
Yes
No
HDR10+ SUPPORT
No
Yes
DOLBY VISION SUPPORT
Yes
The LG A1 (OLED) is very good for movies & TV, while the LG QNED90 (LCD) is only fair.
The LG A1, with its OLED technology, offers superior contrast, perfect black uniformity, and wider viewing angles, which are crucial for a very good movie and cinematic TV experience. The LG QNED90, although an LCD, has fair local dimming and black uniformity but falls short when compared to the OLED performance of the A1, resulting in a less ideal viewing experience for movies.
Sports
6.7/10
8.0/10
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
8.0/10
120Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
8.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
10.0/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
8.0/10
8.7/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
6.3/10
Yes
HLG SUPPORT
Yes
The LG A1 (OLED) is very good for sports, while the LG QNED90 (LCD) is only fair.
The LG A1 (OLED) is very good for watching sports largely due to its excellent response time and very good performance in motion processing which reduces the blur in fast-moving scenes, essential for sports viewing. In contrast, the LG QNED90 (LCD) is only considered fair because, despite its good response time, it has inferior motion processing, as well as less effective handling of reflections and a slightly narrower viewing angle compared to the A1.
Gaming
8.1/10
7.0/10
7.6/10
RESPONSE TIME SCORE
9.0/10
8.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
10.0/10
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
8.0/10
70.0/100
GAMING LOCAL DIMMING
100.0/100
8.6/10
GAME HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
6.3/10
The LG QNED90 (LCD) is very good for gaming, while the LG A1 (OLED) is good.
The LG QNED90 (LCD) offers a high refresh rate which is great for gaming, reducing motion blur and making fast-moving action smoother. In contrast, the LG A1 (OLED) has an excellent response time and very low input lag, providing instantaneous feedback and sharper image transitions, which is beneficial when playing video games.
Bright Room
7.7/10
6.6/10
7.7/10
VIEWING ANGLE
8.8/10
8.7/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
6.3/10
8.3/10
HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
6.1/10
6.0/10
REFLECTIONS SCORE
8.8/10
The LG QNED90 (LCD) is good for bright room, while the LG A1 (OLED) is only fair.
The LG QNED90 is better for bright rooms because its SDR and HDR brightness are higher, making it shine brighter to combat room glare, and its fair reflections handling helps maintain picture clarity. In contrast, the LG A1, despite its excellent contrast and very good handling of reflections, offers only fair SDR and HDR brightness levels, which means it won't be as bright as the QNED90, potentially making it more challenging to view in well-lit environments.
Cost
$2,000
$1,100
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
The LG QNED90 (LCD) has a price of $2,000 and the LG A1 (OLED) costs $1,100.
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG A1 (OLED) to be very good for cartoons & animation, while the LG QNED90 (LCD) is good.
The LG A1 (OLED) excels in showcasing vibrant colors in cartoons and animation due to its very good color gamut, which ensures a wide range of accurate colors. In contrast, the LG QNED90 (LCD) also performs well with colors out of the box but may not display them with the same intensity, owing to its merely good color gamut and volume.
News, Talk, & Other TV
8.0/10
8.4/10
8.7/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
6.3/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
8.0/10
The LG A1 (OLED) and LG QNED90 (LCD) are both very good for news, talk, & other TV.
The LG QNED90, being an LCD, offers very good SDR brightness, making it a suitable choice for watching news and TV programs in well-lit environments, while the LG A1 excels in upscaling lower-resolution content from such broadcasts thanks to its OLED technology. Both TVs offer an array of colors that catch the eye right out of the box, and while the QNED90’s local dimming helps deepen its contrast, the A1 naturally provides profound contrast and a wide color gamut due to its OLED panel.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG QNED90 (LCD) and the LG A1 (OLED) compare to other TVs
"When it comes to HDR brightness it has very bright highlights and impressive HDR. In terms of design the QNED90 looks beautiful. The TV did great with fast response times, excellent reactions and instant rendering of all our commands. If you look for a good performing premium 4K TV the QNED90 ticks all the boxes."
Get a great deal on the LG QNED90 (LCD) or the LG A1 (OLED)
About LG
LG, a prominent TV brand from Korea, has played a significant role in popularizing OLED TVs. OLED technology is hailed as the future of TV technology. Their TVs employ WebOS, a proprietary smart TV software that not only offers seamless functionality but also includes gaming-specific features, earning praise from players worldwide. Often regarded as the gateway to unparalleled viewing experiences, LG's mid-range OLEDs come highly recommended, making them a worthwhile investment for those willing to stretch their budget for superior quality.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec TVs team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest TV information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
385
TVs evaluated
33,110
TVs stats compiled
21
Proprietary TVs ratings developed
121,830
Recommendations made
18,275
Consumer hours saved
About the TV team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and TVs Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Jaime Roldán
TVs Expert
Jaime is a Colombia-based TV expert. He is an electronics engineer with 8 years of experience in the telecom sector and has been making TV recommendations for 12 years.