If you place a higher value on exceptional picture quality and are willing to pay a premium, the LG C3 OLED is an excellent choice. It excels in both dark and bright rooms and is outstanding for watching movies and gaming. However, keep in mind that OLED screens can be susceptible to burn-in if static images are displayed for extended periods.
On the other hand, the LG QNED90 is an LCD TV that costs less and still offers good performance, especially in bright rooms, and it's better suited for news and reality TV. While it also provides a commendable gaming experience, its overall picture quality and dark room performance aren't at the same high level as the C3 OLED. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG QNED90 (LCD)
The LG QNED90 (LCD) has no clear advantages over the LG C3 (OLED).
Advantages of the LG C3 (OLED)
Very good for bright room
Excellent for dark room
Excellent for gaming
Excellent for movies & TV
Very good for sports
Excellent for news, talk, & other TV
Very good for cartoons & animation
Excellent for use as monitor
Very good for upscaling
Very good motion processing
Best in class viewing angle
Best in class reflections
Key differences
Picture Quality
7.3/10
9.0/10
5.60/10
CONTRAST
10.00/10
7.4/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
8.1/10
LED FALD
PANEL TYPE
WOLED
IPS
PANEL SUB-TYPE
WBE
The LG C3 (OLED) has excellent picture quality, while the LG QNED90 (LCD) has good picture quality.
Movies & TV
6.8/10
9.2/10
5.60/10
CONTRAST
10.00/10
5.3/10
BLACK UNIFORMITY
10.0/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
8.0/10
Yes
HDR10 SUPPORT
Yes
No
HDR10+ SUPPORT
No
Yes
DOLBY VISION SUPPORT
Yes
The LG C3 (OLED) is excellent for movies & TV, while the LG QNED90 (LCD) is only fair.
Sports
6.7/10
8.5/10
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
8.0/10
120Hz
REFRESH RATE
120Hz
8.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
10.0/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
8.0/10
8.7/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.0/10
Yes
HLG SUPPORT
Yes
The LG C3 (OLED) is very good for sports, while the LG QNED90 (LCD) is only fair.
The LG QNED90's lower response time and less effective reflections handling cause it to be only fair for sports, whereas the LG C3's top-of-the-line response time and superior reflections handling make it very good for action-packed sports content. Additionally, the C3's wider viewing angles provide a consistent image even from the side, compared to the QNED90, which may display some uniformity inconsistencies when viewed at an angle.
Gaming
8.1/10
9.0/10
7.6/10
RESPONSE TIME SCORE
10.0/10
8.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
10.0/10
7.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
8.0/10
70.0/100
GAMING LOCAL DIMMING
100.0/100
8.6/10
GAME HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.0/10
The LG C3 (OLED) is excellent for gaming, while the LG QNED90 (LCD) is very good.
The LG C3 OLED TV outperforms the LG QNED90 in gaming primarily because it has a better response time and lower input lag, which translates to quicker screen changes and more immediate reactions to user inputs, crucial for a seamless gaming experience. Both TVs have a high refresh rate, ensuring smooth motion, but the superior qualities of the LG C3 make it excellent for gaming compared to the very good performance of the LG QNED90.
Cartoons & Animation
7.6/10
8.8/10
7.8/10
COLOR GAMUT SCORE
8.3/10
7.4/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
8.1/10
8.7/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.0/10
7.6/10
COLORS OUT OF THE BOX SCORE
7.9/10
5.8/10
GRAY UNIFORMITY
10.0/10
The LG C3 (OLED) is very good for cartoons & animation, while the LG QNED90 (LCD) is good.
The LG C3 (OLED) is considered very good for watching cartoons and animation because it offers exceptional color gamut and color volume, which is important for vibrant and diverse colors in animated content. In comparison, the LG QNED90 (LCD), while still good, may not deliver the same level of richness and consistency in colors, particularly in scenes that require a wide color gamut and a higher color volume.
News, Talk, & Other TV
8.0/10
9.0/10
8.7/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.0/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
8.0/10
The LG C3 (OLED) is excellent for news, talk, & other TV, while the LG QNED90 (LCD) is very good.
The LG QNED90 provides very good SDR brightness and upscaling abilities, important for clear and sharp broadcast viewing, but with just good performance in color out of the box and color gamut, it might not display as vividly as others. In contrast, the LG C3 excels in these areas with very good color out of the box and color gamut, in addition to best-in-class contrast that provides exceptional depth and detail for news and talk shows.
Bright Room
7.7/10
8.3/10
7.7/10
VIEWING ANGLE
9.5/10
8.7/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.0/10
8.3/10
HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.0/10
6.0/10
REFLECTIONS SCORE
10.0/10
The LG C3 (OLED) is very good for bright room, while the LG QNED90 (LCD) is good.
"When it comes to HDR brightness it has very bright highlights and impressive HDR. In terms of design the QNED90 looks beautiful. The TV did great with fast response times, excellent reactions and instant rendering of all our commands. If you look for a good performing premium 4K TV the QNED90 ticks all the boxes."
Get a great deal on the LG QNED90 (LCD) or the LG C3 (OLED)
About LG
LG, a prominent TV brand from Korea, has played a significant role in popularizing OLED TVs. OLED technology is hailed as the future of TV technology. Their TVs employ WebOS, a proprietary smart TV software that not only offers seamless functionality but also includes gaming-specific features, earning praise from players worldwide. Often regarded as the gateway to unparalleled viewing experiences, LG's mid-range OLEDs come highly recommended, making them a worthwhile investment for those willing to stretch their budget for superior quality.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec TVs team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest TV information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
385
TVs evaluated
33,110
TVs stats compiled
21
Proprietary TVs ratings developed
118,830
Recommendations made
17,825
Consumer hours saved
About the TV team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and TVs Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Jaime Roldán
TVs Expert
Jaime is a Colombia-based TV expert. He is an electronics engineer with 8 years of experience in the telecom sector and has been making TV recommendations for 12 years.