If you are looking for a budget-friendly TV, the Hisense A4H might be appealing due to its lower cost. It offers acceptable performance for gaming and watching animations but is not as suitable for dark room viewing, with modest brightness levels, and lower performance in bright rooms.
The LG QNED90, on the other hand, is more expensive but provides a superior viewing experience in various contexts. It has a larger screen size and better picture quality overall. It performs well for gaming, sports, and bright room viewing due to its higher brightness and better handling of reflections. This TV also offers enhanced features for watching movies and HDR content, with support for Dolby Vision and a wider range of colors.
So, if you prioritize higher performance and feature set over price, the LG QNED90 would be the better choice. However, if budget is a constraint and you mostly watch content in moderate lighting conditions, the Hisense A4H might suffice. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Hisense A4H (LCD)
The Hisense A4H (LCD) has no clear advantages over the LG QNED90 (LCD).
Advantages of the LG QNED90 (LCD)
Good for bright room
Good for dark room
Very good for gaming
Very good for news, talk, & other TV
Good for cartoons & animation
Good for use as monitor
Good motion processing
Key differences
Picture Quality
5.3/10
7.3/10
3.80/10
CONTRAST
5.60/10
6.3/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
7.4/10
LED
PANEL TYPE
LED FALD
IPS
PANEL SUB-TYPE
IPS
The LG QNED90 (LCD) has good picture quality, while the Hisense A4H (LCD) has poor picture quality.
Movies & TV
5.2/10
6.8/10
3.80/10
CONTRAST
5.60/10
5.5/10
BLACK UNIFORMITY
5.3/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
7.5/10
No
HDR10 SUPPORT
Yes
No
HDR10+ SUPPORT
No
No
DOLBY VISION SUPPORT
Yes
The LG QNED90 (LCD) is only fair for movies & TV, while the Hisense A4H (LCD) is poor.
Sports
6.1/10
6.7/10
2.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
7.5/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
120Hz
8.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
8.0/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
7.5/10
5.7/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.7/10
No
HLG SUPPORT
Yes
The LG QNED90 (LCD) and Hisense A4H (LCD) are both only fair for sports, though the LG QNED90 (LCD) is somewhat better.
The Hisense A4H has poor response time and fair handling of reflections, which can affect the clarity of fast-moving sports; meanwhile, the LG QNED90 has a better response time but also has fair reflection handling, so while motion may be clearer, both may struggle with glare in bright rooms. Both TVs have fair viewing angles, which is good for watching with a group, but the LG QNED90 might have a slight edge in gray uniformity, important for even playing field appearance during sports viewing.
Gaming
5.6/10
8.1/10
5.9/10
RESPONSE TIME SCORE
7.6/10
8.0/10
INPUT LAG SCORE
8.0/10
2.5/10
MOTION PROCESSING
7.5/10
0.0/100
GAMING LOCAL DIMMING
70.0/100
2.5/10
GAME HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.6/10
The LG QNED90 (LCD) is very good for gaming, while the Hisense A4H (LCD) is poor.
The Hisense A4H has a poor response time which can cause motion blur during fast-paced games, while the LG QNED90's good response time provides smoother motion. Additionally, although both TVs have very good input lag, the LG QNED90 supports a higher refresh rate of 120Hz, which can result in more fluid gameplay especially for fast-moving content.
Cartoons & Animation
5.9/10
7.6/10
6.0/10
COLOR GAMUT SCORE
7.8/10
6.3/10
COLOR VOLUME SCORE
7.4/10
5.7/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.7/10
8.3/10
COLORS OUT OF THE BOX SCORE
7.6/10
7.7/10
GRAY UNIFORMITY
5.8/10
The LG QNED90 (LCD) is good for cartoons & animation, while the Hisense A4H (LCD) is poor.
The Hisense A4H struggles with cartoons and animation because, despite having very good colors out of the box, it has only fair color gamut and volume, leading to less vivid and diverse colors. Conversely, the LG QNED90 performs well with such content due to its good ratings across the board for colors out of the box, color gamut, and volume, ensuring a more robust and vibrant color presentation.
News, Talk, & Other TV
5.9/10
8.0/10
5.7/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.7/10
7.5/10
UPSCALING
7.5/10
The LG QNED90 (LCD) is very good for news, talk, & other TV, while the Hisense A4H (LCD) is poor.
The LG QNED90 performs better for news, talk shows, and other TV programs because it has superior upscaling and SDR brightness, enhancing clarity and visibility, especially in well-lit environments, but it comes at a higher cost. The Hisense A4H struggles in these areas, which is particularly noticeable in bright rooms, yet it's more affordable.
Bright Room
4.7/10
7.7/10
7.4/10
VIEWING ANGLE
7.7/10
5.7/10
SDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.7/10
2.5/10
HDR BRIGHTNESS SCORE
8.3/10
6.6/10
REFLECTIONS SCORE
6.0/10
The LG QNED90 (LCD) is good for bright room, while the Hisense A4H (LCD) is poor.
The Hisense A4H has poor SDR and HDR brightness, making it less suitable for bright rooms, while the LG QNED90 has very good SDR and HDR brightness, which along with better reflection handling contributes to a more clear and visible picture in well-lit environments.
Cost
$178
$2,000
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
The Hisense A4H (LCD) has a price of $178 and the LG QNED90 (LCD) costs $2,000.
"When it comes to HDR brightness it has very bright highlights and impressive HDR. In terms of design the QNED90 looks beautiful. The TV did great with fast response times, excellent reactions and instant rendering of all our commands. If you look for a good performing premium 4K TV the QNED90 ticks all the boxes."
Get a great deal on the Hisense A4H (LCD) or the LG QNED90 (LCD)
About Hisense
Hisense, a Chinese TV manufacturer, entered the US market in approximately 2011 and has since acquired TV divisions from various companies such as Toshiba, Sharp, Hitachi, and NEC. Currently ranking as the fourth largest vendor in terms of sales volume, Hisense aims to capture a wide range of TV budget segments. They offer exceptional value with TVs that often outperform their competitors at similar price points, making them a compelling choice for consumers. In the US, they use Google TV as their smart TV software which provides the largest app selection and a very modern user interface, however it is not as user friendly as the software from other vendors.
About LG
LG, a prominent TV brand from Korea, has played a significant role in popularizing OLED TVs. OLED technology is hailed as the future of TV technology. Their TVs employ WebOS, a proprietary smart TV software that not only offers seamless functionality but also includes gaming-specific features, earning praise from players worldwide. Often regarded as the gateway to unparalleled viewing experiences, LG's mid-range OLEDs come highly recommended, making them a worthwhile investment for those willing to stretch their budget for superior quality.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec TVs team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest TV information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
385
TVs evaluated
33,110
TVs stats compiled
21
Proprietary TVs ratings developed
121,530
Recommendations made
18,230
Consumer hours saved
About the TV team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and TVs Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Jaime Roldán
TVs Expert
Jaime is a Colombia-based TV expert. He is an electronics engineer with 8 years of experience in the telecom sector and has been making TV recommendations for 12 years.