A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
38WN95C
Company ProductName Specs




39GS95QE
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

If you're looking for a monitor with better color accuracy for tasks like digital photo editing, the LG 38WN95C with its IPS panel is a solid choice. However, for an immersive gaming and HDR video editing experience, the LG 39GS95QE's OLED technology offers superior contrast and response time, making blacks deeper and reducing motion blur. Note that while the OLED version excels in color depth and contrast, its brightness is lower, which might affect visibility in well-lit rooms. Keep in mind, the OLED model's refresh rate is higher, favoring competitive gaming, but its resolution is slightly lower, which could impact productivity tasks that benefit from more screen real estate. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 38WN95C (IPS)
  • Good text clarity
  • Good image clarity
  • Good brightness
Advantages of the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Good for media consumption
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

6.1
38WN95C
39GS95QE
9.7
3840 x 1600
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
898:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
477 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
692 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
94.1 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 38WN95C (IPS) is only fair.

Competitive Gaming

4.5
38WN95C
39GS95QE
6.3
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
7.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
20 - 144 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
477 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
The LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the LG 38WN95C (IPS) is poor.

Productivity

6.6
38WN95C
39GS95QE
5.4
3840 x 1600
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
111 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
102 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 38WN95C (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

6.2
38WN95C
39GS95QE
7.6
3840 x 1600
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
898:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
477 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
692 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the LG 38WN95C (IPS) is only fair.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
38WN95C
39GS95QE
Yes
The LG 38WN95C (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Print Photo Editing

No
38WN95C
39GS95QE
Yes
The LG 38WN95C (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Cost

$1,600
38WN95C
39GS95QE
$1,500
Product imageProduct image

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

The LG 38WN95C (IPS) has a price of $1,600 and the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) costs $1,500.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
38WN95C
39GS95QE
Yes
Both the LG 38WN95C (IPS) and LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
38WN95C
39GS95QE
No
Both the LG 38WN95C (IPS) and LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 38WN95C (IPS) and the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 38WN95C (IPS)LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED)
LG 38WN95C (IPS)LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$1,600
$1,500
Screen Size
38"39"
Resolution
3840 x 16003440 x 1440
Screen Type
LEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSW-OLED
Local Dimming Zones
4N/A

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
898:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
477 nits275 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
692 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %Unknown

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
7.1 ms0.03 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 144 Hz48 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
6.6/108/10
Ghosting Score
7.9/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
111 PPI102 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
7.2/106.4/10
Image Clarity Score
7.2/106.7/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
126,800
Recommendations made
19,020
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo