If you prioritize a larger screen and the best competitive gaming experience, the AOC AG456UCZD with its superior gaming performance would be a good choice, but its text clarity and image quality for productivity are not as good. On the other hand, the LG 39GS95QE offers slightly better text clarity and image quality, making it a better option for productivity and media consumption, though it has lower gaming capabilities. Both monitors are premium-priced and offer excellent color depth and HDR support for a vibrant viewing experience. Consider the LG if you want a balance between work and play at a slightly lower cost. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED)
The AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) has no clear advantages over the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED).
Advantages of the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED)
Good for media consumption
Key differences
Productivity
3.8/10
5.4/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
83 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
102 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) and AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) are both poor for productivity, though the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) is somewhat better.
Media Consumption
5.9/10
7.6/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) is poor.
Cost
$1,400
$1,500
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
The AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) has a price of $1,400 and the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) costs $1,500.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
9.6/10
9.7/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) and AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.
Competitive Gaming
6.0/10
6.3/10
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
The LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) and AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) are both only fair for competitive gaming.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
Yes
Both the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) and LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) and LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) and LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) and LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED) and the LG 39GS95QE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,600
Recommendations made
17,490
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.