A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Studio Display
Company ProductName Specs




38WN95C
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you prioritize image clarity and superior text quality in your work, the Apple Studio Display is a strong choice, despite its higher cost; however, it falls short for gaming and lacks versatility in display adjustments. On the other hand, the LG 38WN95C offers a broader screen and an adjustable stand which can enhance productivity, and it supports a wider range of refresh rates making it better for casual gaming. It's also more affordable, but its overall image and text clarity might not match the Apple's display. Neither monitor is the best fit for competitive gaming, where high refresh rates and low response times are crucial. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Apple Studio Display (IPS)
  • Best in class for productivity
  • Good for media consumption
  • Best in class text clarity
  • Best in class image clarity
Advantages of the LG 38WN95C (IPS)
  • Good response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Productivity

9.5
Studio Display
38WN95C
6.6
5120 x 2880
RESOLUTION
3840 x 1600
218 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
111 PPI
No
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Apple Studio Display (IPS) is best in class for productivity, while the LG 38WN95C (IPS) is only fair.

Media Consumption

7.0
Studio Display
38WN95C
6.2
5120 x 2880
RESOLUTION
3840 x 1600
1052:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
898:1
584 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
477 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
692 nits
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Apple Studio Display (IPS) is good for media consumption, while the LG 38WN95C (IPS) is only fair.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

6.1
Studio Display
38WN95C
6.1
5120 x 2880
RESOLUTION
3840 x 1600
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1052:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
898:1
584 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
477 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
692 nits
N/A
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
94.1 %
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The LG 38WN95C (IPS) and Apple Studio Display (IPS) are both only fair for casual gaming.

Competitive Gaming

5.0
Studio Display
38WN95C
4.5
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
20.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
7.1 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 144 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
584 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
477 nits
The Apple Studio Display (IPS) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming.

Cost

$1,599
Studio Display
38WN95C
$1,600
Product imageProduct image

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

The Apple Studio Display (IPS) has a price of $1,599 and the LG 38WN95C (IPS) costs $1,600.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
Studio Display
38WN95C
No
Both the Apple Studio Display (IPS) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
Studio Display
38WN95C
Yes
Both the Apple Studio Display (IPS) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
Studio Display
38WN95C
No
Both the Apple Studio Display (IPS) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
Studio Display
38WN95C
No
Both the Apple Studio Display (IPS) and LG 38WN95C (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Apple Studio Display (IPS) and the LG 38WN95C (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Apple Studio Display (IPS)LG 38WN95C (IPS)
Apple Studio Display (IPS)LG 38WN95C (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$1,599
$1,600
Screen Size
27"38"
Resolution
5120 x 28803840 x 1600
Screen Type
LEDLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS
Local Dimming Zones
N/A4

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1052:1898:1
SDR Peak Brightness
584 nits477 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
N/A692 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoNo
sRGB Color Gamut
99.1 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
20.4 ms7.1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A20 - 144 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/106.6/10
Ghosting Score
6/107.9/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
218 PPI111 PPI
Coating
GlossyMatte
Text Clarity Score
10/107.2/10
Image Clarity Score
10/107.2/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
02
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
126,800
Recommendations made
19,020
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo