A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
34WQ75C
Company ProductName Specs




MAG 271QPX
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·

If you are focused on casual gaming and productivity on a tighter budget, the LG 34WQ75C with its wider screen and good text quality could serve you well. However, if you prioritize top-notch gaming performance and are willing to spend more, the MSI MAG 271QPX, with its superior contrast and color performance, is excellent for competitive gaming and HDR video editing. Keep in mind, the LG has a larger screen that may be better for multitasking, but the MSI offers higher color fidelity, which is great for media consumption. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 34WQ75C (IPS)
  • Good text clarity
Advantages of the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Best in class for competitive gaming
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Best in class refresh rate
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class brightness
  • Best in class color volume
  • Best in class response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.8
34WQ75C
MAG 271QPX
10.0
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
360Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
85.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.1 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

3.8
34WQ75C
MAG 271QPX
10.0
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
360Hz
5.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 360 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
The MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is poor.

Media Consumption

5.9
34WQ75C
MAG 271QPX
9.8
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$600
34WQ75C
MAG 271QPX
$750
Product image
Product image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

The LG 34WQ75C (IPS) has a price of $600 and the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) costs $750.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
34WQ75C
MAG 271QPX
Yes
The LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

No
34WQ75C
MAG 271QPX
Yes
The LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
34WQ75C
MAG 271QPX
Yes
The LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Productivity

6.0
34WQ75C
MAG 271QPX
6.0
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
110 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34WQ75C (IPS) and MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) are both only fair for productivity.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
34WQ75C
MAG 271QPX
Yes
Both the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) and MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) and the MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 34WQ75C (IPS)MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED)
LG 34WQ75C (IPS)MSI MAG 271QPX (QD-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$600
$750
Screen Size
34"27"
Resolution
3440 x 14402560 x 1440
Screen Type
LEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSQD-OLED
Refresh Rate
60Hz360Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
300 nits1000 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoYes
sRGB Color Gamut
99 %138.4 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
5 ms0.03 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A48 - 360 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/109.5/10
Ghosting Score
8.2/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
110 PPI110 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
7.1/106.6/10
Image Clarity Score
7.1/107.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,600
Recommendations made
17,490
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo