A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
34WQ75C
Company ProductName Specs




45GS96QB
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·

If you're looking for a more affordable monitor that's suitable for everyday productivity and casual gaming, the LG monitor is a solid choice with good color coverage and a comfortable size. However, if you're a serious gamer or a professional in digital photo editing, and are willing to invest more, the MSI monitor's OLED panel offers vastly superior contrast and is also suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption. The MSI also has a higher refresh rate which provides a smoother gaming experience. Keep in mind, for tasks where text clarity and sharpness are crucial, the LG might perform better due to its higher pixels per inch. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 34WQ75C (IPS)
  • Good text clarity
  • Good image clarity
Advantages of the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.8
34WQ75C
45GS96QB
9.5
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
85.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

3.8
34WQ75C
45GS96QB
5.9
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
5.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
The MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Productivity

6.0
34WQ75C
45GS96QB
2.7
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
110 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

5.9
34WQ75C
45GS96QB
5.4
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34WQ75C (IPS) and MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) are both poor for media consumption, though the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is somewhat better.

Cost

$600
34WQ75C
45GS96QB
$1,700
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

The LG 34WQ75C (IPS) has a price of $600 and the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) costs $1,700.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
34WQ75C
45GS96QB
Yes
The LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

No
34WQ75C
45GS96QB
Yes
The LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
34WQ75C
45GS96QB
No
Both the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) and MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
34WQ75C
45GS96QB
Yes
Both the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) and MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) and the MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 34WQ75C (IPS)MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED)
LG 34WQ75C (IPS)MSI 45GS96QB (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$600
$1,700
Screen Size
34"45"
Resolution
3440 x 14403440 x 1440
Screen Type
LEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSW-OLED
Refresh Rate
60Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
300 nits275 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoYes
sRGB Color Gamut
99 %Unknown

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
5 ms0.03 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
N/A48 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/108/10
Ghosting Score
8.2/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
110 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
7.1/101.4/10
Image Clarity Score
7.1/102.5/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
20
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,900
Recommendations made
16,185
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo