If you prioritize a wider screen for immersive casual gaming and a more traditional aspect ratio which benefits media consumption, the LG 34WQ75C could be the better choice, albeit with a standard performance in color accuracy and viewing angles typical of IPS panels. On the other hand, if your focus is more on productivity with split-screen capability and precise color reproduction for digital photo editing, the LG DualUp 28MQ780 offers a unique aspect ratio and higher pixels per inch, which can enhance text and image clarity. Keep in mind, neither monitor is ideal for competitive gaming due to their lower refresh rates and neither is suited for HDR gaming or media consumption. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 34WQ75C (IPS)
Very good response time
Advantages of the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS)
Good for productivity
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
3.8/10
4.9/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
5.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
10.0 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is somewhat better.
Productivity
6.0/10
7.7/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 2880
110 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
139 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is good for productivity, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is only fair.
Media Consumption
5.9/10
6.5/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 2880
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is poor.
Cost
$600
$552
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
$900
The LG 34WQ75C (IPS) has a price of $600 and the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) costs $552.
Digital Photo Editing
No
Yes
The LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing while the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
5.8/10
5.8/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 2880
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
85.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) and LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) and LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) and the LG DualUp 28MQ780 (IPS) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
94,100
Recommendations made
14,115
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.