A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
34GS95QE
Company ProductName Specs




34WQ75C
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·

If you prioritize high-end gaming with smoother visuals and less motion blur, the LG 34GS95QE with its much higher refresh rate and faster response time would be a significant upgrade, particularly suitable for competitive gaming. However, it comes at a premium price. On the other hand, if you're looking for a monitor that's more budget-friendly and still offers good color accuracy for tasks like digital photo editing, the LG 34WQ75C with an IPS panel would be a cost-effective choice, but it's not the best for fast-paced gaming due to its lower refresh rate and slower response time. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Good for media consumption
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 34WQ75C (IPS)
  • Good text clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.7
34GS95QE
34WQ75C
5.8
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
85.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

6.3
34GS95QE
34WQ75C
3.8
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
5.0 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is poor.

Media Consumption

7.8
34GS95QE
34WQ75C
5.9
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
275 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$1,300
34GS95QE
34WQ75C
$600
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

The LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) has a price of $1,300 and the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) costs $600.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
34GS95QE
34WQ75C
No
The LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
34GS95QE
34WQ75C
No
The LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Productivity

5.7
34GS95QE
34WQ75C
6.0
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG 34WQ75C (IPS) to be only fair for productivity, while the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) is poor.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
34GS95QE
34WQ75C
No
Both the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
34GS95QE
34WQ75C
Yes
Both the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED) and the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED)LG 34WQ75C (IPS)
LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED)LG 34WQ75C (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$1,300
$600
Screen Size
34"34"
Resolution
3440 x 1440 3440 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDIPS
Refresh Rate
240Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
275 nits300 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesNo
sRGB Color Gamut
Unknown99 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.03 ms5 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 240 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/105/10
Ghosting Score
10/108.2/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
109 PPI110 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.6/107.1/10
Image Clarity Score
7/107.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
02
HDMI 2.1 Ports
20
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,900
Recommendations made
16,185
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo