A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
27EQ850
Company ProductName Specs




34WQ75C
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you're willing to invest in a premium experience, especially for HDR gaming and media consumption, the LG 27EQ850 with its OLED technology offers exceptional contrast and color depth, making it a solid choice for image clarity and color accuracy, which is beneficial for print photo editing. This monitor won't be as responsive for competitive gaming due to lower refresh rates and more noticeable ghosting. On the other hand, the LG 34WQ75C presents a more budget-friendly alternative with an ultrawide screen optimal for productivity tasks, but it falls short in HDR performance and overall image quality compared to the OLED model. For casual gaming and everyday use, the IPS monitor is adequate, but for a truly vibrant and immersive experience in media and precision tasks, the more expensive OLED is superior. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Good for media consumption
  • Very good image clarity
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 34WQ75C (IPS)
  • Good text clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.5
27EQ850
34WQ75C
5.8
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
85.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

5.4
27EQ850
34WQ75C
3.8
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
5.0 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Productivity

6.6
27EQ850
34WQ75C
6.0
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
163 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are both only fair for productivity, though the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

7.8
27EQ850
34WQ75C
5.9
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
200 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$1,997
27EQ850
34WQ75C
$600
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

$3,000

The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) has a price of $1,997 and the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) costs $600.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
27EQ850
34WQ75C
No
The LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Digital Photo Editing

No
27EQ850
34WQ75C
No
Both the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are not suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
27EQ850
34WQ75C
No
Both the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
27EQ850
34WQ75C
Yes
Both the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED) and the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED)LG 34WQ75C (IPS)
LG 27EQ850 (W-OLED)LG 34WQ75C (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$1,997
$600
Screen Size
27"34"
Resolution
3840 x 21603440 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDIPS
Refresh Rate
60Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
200 nits300 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesNo
sRGB Color Gamut
99 %99 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1 ms5 ms
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/105/10
Ghosting Score
9.6/108.2/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
163 PPI110 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.9/107.1/10
Image Clarity Score
8/107.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
12
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
107,900
Recommendations made
16,185
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo