If you're a dedicated gamer, especially one into fast-paced competitive gaming, the Corsair monitor, with its superior response time and very good refresh rate, excels in delivering smooth visual experiences and would be an excellent choice, despite its higher cost. For productivity and digital photo editing, the Innocn with its crisp resolution and excellent color accuracy, along with features suitable for print photo editing, is a more budget-friendly option. The Corsair shines in HDR gaming and media consumption because of its high HDR brightness and wide color gamut, but the Innocn is no slouch in this area and offers great capabilities for less investment. If you're not keen on spending a premium and focus more on professional work with some casual gaming, the Innocn may serve you well. However, if the budget allows and gaming performance is a priority, the Corsair could significantly enhance your gaming experience. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED)
Very good for casual gaming
Very good refresh rate
Best in class contrast
Excellent response time
Advantages of the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED)
Best in class for productivity
Good for media consumption
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Good brightness
Very good color volume
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
5.4/10
4.6/10
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1.6 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.3 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 144 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
141 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
The Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) and Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) is somewhat better.
Productivity
3.9/10
9.7/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
84 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
139 PPI
No
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) is best in class for productivity, while the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) is poor.
Media Consumption
5.7/10
7.8/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
141 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
632 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1200 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) is good for media consumption, while the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) is poor.
Cost
$1,700
$800
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
The Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) has a price of $1,700 and the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) costs $800.
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
8.1/10
7.6/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
141 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
632 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1200 nits
97.6 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) to be very good for casual gaming, while the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) is good.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
Yes
Both the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) and Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) and Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) and Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) and the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) compare to other monitors
"Whlie not perfect, the Innocn 32M2V is an excellent HDR gaming monitor if you want a 32″ 4K high refresh rate display – just make sure you’re familiar with all its flaws. If you’ve been waiting for a 32″ 4K high refresh rate gaming monitor with proper HDR support, the Innocn 32M2V is the first model available at a reasonable price."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,800
Recommendations made
17,670
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.