If you prioritize an exceptional image quality for HDR gaming and media consumption with the deepest blacks and vibrant colors, either the Corsair 45WQHD240 or the LG 45GR95QE, both featuring OLED technology, will excel in these areas. However, if budget is a concern, the LG offers a similar quality at a lower price point. The Corsair does have higher brightness, which could enhance HDR performance, but it lacks an adjustable stand, which can be important for ergonomics. For tasks that demand accurate color reproduction, such as digital photo editing, both monitors are suitable, though neither is optimized for HDR video editing. For competitive gaming, their high refresh rates and low response times are great, but in productivity tasks, their poor text quality might be a drawback. Overall, consider the LG if you want to save money without compromising much on performance and features. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED)
Very good for casual gaming
Excellent response time
Advantages of the LG 45GR95QE (W-OLED)
Very good for competitive gaming
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
5.4/10
8.1/10
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1.6 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
2.7 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
141 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
203 nits
The LG 45GR95QE (W-OLED) is very good for competitive gaming, while the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) is poor.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
8.1/10
7.8/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
141 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
203 nits
632 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
665 nits
97.6 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
96.9 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) to be very good for casual gaming, while the LG 45GR95QE (W-OLED) is good.
Productivity
3.9/10
3.9/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
84 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
84 PPI
No
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 45GR95QE (W-OLED) and Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) are both poor for productivity.
Media Consumption
5.7/10
5.7/10
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
141 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
203 nits
632 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
665 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 45GR95QE (W-OLED) and Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) are both poor for media consumption.
Cost
$1,700
$1,700
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
The Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) has a price of $1,700 and the LG 45GR95QE (W-OLED) costs $1,700.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
Yes
Both the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) and LG 45GR95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) and LG 45GR95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) and LG 45GR95QE (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) and LG 45GR95QE (W-OLED) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) and the LG 45GR95QE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors
"The LG UltraGear 45GR95QE-B is a brilliant ultrawide gaming monitor that'll dominate your desk, and its 800R curve serves to trick the senses. It's ridiculously pricey, and 4K fans may notice the difference with this 4K panel, but its OLED capabilities and arsenal of features almost justify its price tag. Just make sure you've got decent PC specs and plenty of space for this brute before parting with any cash."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,300
Recommendations made
17,445
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.