If image clarity and text quality are top priorities for work such as digital photo editing, the Apple Studio Display with its higher resolution and attention to color accuracy might be worth the investment. However, if you're focused on gaming—especially competitive gaming—the LG with its higher refresh rate and variable refresh rate (VRR) support will be better suited, offering a smoother experience. For HDR gaming and media, the OLED technology in the LG monitor provides superior contrast and deeper blacks. Keep in mind, the Apple monitor may not perform as well for gaming due to its lower refresh rate and lack of VRR. Conversely, the LG's lower pixels per inch might not be as suitable for tasks that benefit from higher screen resolutions, like detailed photo editing. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Apple Studio Display (IPS)
Best in class for productivity
Good for media consumption
Best in class text clarity
Best in class image clarity
Good brightness
Advantages of the LG 45GR95QE (W-OLED)
Good for casual gaming
Very good for competitive gaming
Very good refresh rate
Best in class contrast
Very good response time
Key differences
Casual Gaming
6.1/10
7.8/10
5120 x 2880
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1052:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
584 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
203 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
665 nits
N/A
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
96.9 %
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The LG 45GR95QE (W-OLED) is good for casual gaming, while the Apple Studio Display (IPS) is only fair.
Competitive Gaming
5.0/10
8.1/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
20.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
2.7 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
584 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
203 nits
The LG 45GR95QE (W-OLED) is very good for competitive gaming, while the Apple Studio Display (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
9.5/10
3.9/10
5120 x 2880
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
218 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
84 PPI
No
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Apple Studio Display (IPS) is best in class for productivity, while the LG 45GR95QE (W-OLED) is poor.
Media Consumption
7.0/10
5.7/10
5120 x 2880
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1052:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
584 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
203 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
665 nits
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Apple Studio Display (IPS) is good for media consumption, while the LG 45GR95QE (W-OLED) is poor.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
Yes
The Apple Studio Display (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 45GR95QE (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Key similarities
Cost
$1,599
$1,700
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
The Apple Studio Display (IPS) has a price of $1,599 and the LG 45GR95QE (W-OLED) costs $1,700.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Apple Studio Display (IPS) and LG 45GR95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Apple Studio Display (IPS) and LG 45GR95QE (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Apple Studio Display (IPS) and LG 45GR95QE (W-OLED) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Apple Studio Display (IPS) and the LG 45GR95QE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors
"The LG UltraGear 45GR95QE-B is a brilliant ultrawide gaming monitor that'll dominate your desk, and its 800R curve serves to trick the senses. It's ridiculously pricey, and 4K fans may notice the difference with this 4K panel, but its OLED capabilities and arsenal of features almost justify its price tag. Just make sure you've got decent PC specs and plenty of space for this brute before parting with any cash."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.