The Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) offers high static contrast, HDR capability, and is well-suited to HDR gaming and media consumption, digital photo editing, print photo editing, and productivity tasks, with a traditional 16:9 aspect ratio and 4K resolution that's ideal for detailed work and multitasking. On the other hand, the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) provides an outstanding contrast ratio with deeper blacks, wider color gamut coverage, and excellent color volume which enhances the viewing experience for HDR video editing and media consumption; it also has a wider 21:9 aspect ratio for immersive gaming and multitasking. However, it has a lower resolution than 4K and a screen coating that may affect text clarity. The higher refresh rate and ultra-fast response time of the MSI make it a superior option for competitive gaming, yet the longer response time of the Innocn may result in ghosting which can detract from fast-paced gaming. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED)
Best in class for productivity
Good text clarity
Advantages of the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Best in class for media consumption
Good refresh rate
Best in class contrast
Best in class brightness
Best in class color volume
Best in class response time
Key differences
Casual Gaming
7.6/10
9.9/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
600 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
1200 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.3 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) is good.
Competitive Gaming
4.6/10
5.8/10
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
175Hz
8.3 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.0 ms
48 - 144 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 175 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
600 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
The MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) and Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) is somewhat better.
Productivity
9.7/10
5.9/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
139 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) is best in class for productivity, while the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) is poor.
Media Consumption
7.8/10
9.8/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
600 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
1000 nits
1200 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) is good.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
Yes
The Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Key similarities
Cost
$800
$800
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
The Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) has a price of $800 and the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) costs $800.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
Yes
Both the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) and MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) and MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) and MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Innocn 32M2V (IPS MiniLED) and the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors
"Whlie not perfect, the Innocn 32M2V is an excellent HDR gaming monitor if you want a 32″ 4K high refresh rate display – just make sure you’re familiar with all its flaws. If you’ve been waiting for a 32″ 4K high refresh rate gaming monitor with proper HDR support, the Innocn 32M2V is the first model available at a reasonable price."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.