A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
MAG 341CQP
Company ProductName Specs




27E1N8900
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 22, 2024·

The MSI MAG 341CQP's ultrawide screen and high refresh rate make it excellent for immersive gaming and multitasking. However, its size and resolution might not be the best for sharp text in productivity tasks. The Phillips 27E1N8900 has a higher resolution for clearer images and text, making it better for productivity and detailed photo editing. Both offer vibrant colors and deep blacks due to OLED technology, which is great for media consumption. If you prefer an ultrawide gaming experience and don't mind the lower pixels per inch, go for the MSI. If you prioritize sharp text and image detail for work and editing, the Phillips is the better choice. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED)
  • Good refresh rate
  • Best in class brightness
  • Best in class color volume
Advantages of the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED)
  • Very good image clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Productivity

5.9
MAG 341CQP
27E1N8900
6.9
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
163 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) is only fair for productivity, while the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) is poor.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

Yes
MAG 341CQP
27E1N8900
No
The MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.9
MAG 341CQP
27E1N8900
9.7
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
99.3 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.7 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Competitive Gaming

5.8
MAG 341CQP
27E1N8900
5.9
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.1 ms
48 - 175 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
The Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) and MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) are both poor for competitive gaming.

Media Consumption

9.8
MAG 341CQP
27E1N8900
9.5
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
1000 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
540 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are both best in class for media consumption.

Cost

$800
MAG 341CQP
27E1N8900
$800
Product imageProduct image

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

The MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) has a price of $800 and the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) costs $800.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
MAG 341CQP
27E1N8900
Yes
Both the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
MAG 341CQP
27E1N8900
Yes
Both the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
MAG 341CQP
27E1N8900
Yes
Both the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) and Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED) and the Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED)Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED)
MSI MAG 341CQP (QD-OLED)Phillips 27E1N8900 (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$800
$800
Screen Size
34"27"
Resolution
3440 x 1440 3840 x 2160
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
QD-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
175Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
1000 nits540 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
UnknownUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
139.1 %150 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.03 ms0.1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 175 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
7.2/105/10
Ghosting Score
10/1010/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
109 PPI163 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.6/106.9/10
Image Clarity Score
7/108/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
02
HDMI 2.1 Ports
20
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
97,400
Recommendations made
14,610
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo