If you prioritize competitive gaming and are looking for the best experience with deep blacks and high contrast, then the Cooler Master GZ2711 with its OLED panel would be a superior choice, but it is less suitable for activities like productivity due to its lower resolution. For a higher resolution which is advantageous for productivity tasks, the Gigabyte M28U with its larger screen and sharp text clarity is more appropriate and is also capable of casual gaming. However, the OLED monitor offers better HDR performance and color depth for HDR gaming and media consumption, which the IPS monitor cannot match. Keep in mind, the cost for the Cooler Master GZ2711 is significantly higher, so consider if these benefits align with your budget and specific use cases. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Best in class for competitive gaming
Good for media consumption
Very good refresh rate
Best in class contrast
Good brightness
Best in class response time
Advantages of the Gigabyte M28U (IPS)
Very good for productivity
Good text clarity
Key differences
Casual Gaming
9.7/10
6.1/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1228:1
450 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
312 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
495 nits
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
65.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) is only fair.
Competitive Gaming
9.6/10
5.7/10
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
0.3 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
7.7 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 144 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
450 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
312 nits
The Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
5.8/10
8.8/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
160 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M28U (IPS) is very good for productivity, while the Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) is poor.
Media Consumption
7.9/10
6.7/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1228:1
450 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
312 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
495 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) is only fair.
Cost
$900
$470
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
The Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) has a price of $900 and the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) costs $470.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
No
The Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing while the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) and Gigabyte M28U (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) and Gigabyte M28U (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) and the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) compare to other monitors
"Fundamentally the M28U is an impressive 4K monitor; between the resolution, refresh rate, and IPS panel, it's a great all-rounder for the step up to 4K. Even beyond PC gaming, the inclusion of a HDMI 2.1 port offers 120Hz gaming for consoles, so it's quite the multi-faceted package for its price. Gigabyte has made no major sacrifice to tick all the checkboxes with the M28U."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,800
Recommendations made
17,670
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.