If competitive gaming is a priority, the Cooler Master GZ2711's higher refresh rate and quicker response time make it the better fit, providing smoother gameplay and less ghosting. For a more immersive experience with superior image clarity, especially in HDR gaming and media consumption, the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF's wider display with its curve will be more appealing. The Dell is also slightly better for digital photo editing due to a broader color spectrum. However, if print photo editing is critical, the Cooler Master's higher AdobeRGB coverage would benefit you. Both monitors have OLED panels with infinite contrast and deep blacks, but the Dell's glossy coating can produce more vibrant visuals at the cost of reflecting more ambient light. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED)
Best in class for competitive gaming
Very good refresh rate
Good brightness
Advantages of the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED)
Excellent for media consumption
Best in class color volume
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
9.6/10
5.0/10
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
0.3 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.4 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 165 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
450 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
240 nits
The Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) is poor.
Media Consumption
7.9/10
9.4/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
450 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
240 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
459 nits
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) is excellent for media consumption, while the Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) is good.
Cost
$900
$650
$200
$400
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
The Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) has a price of $900 and the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) costs $650.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing while the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
9.7/10
9.5/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
450 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
240 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
459 nits
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.5 %
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) and Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.
Productivity
5.8/10
5.7/10
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Glossy
The Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) and Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) are both poor for productivity.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
Yes
Both the Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) and Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) and Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) and Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) and the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors
"It may seem like a minor tweak, but the addition of a glossy anti-glare coating makes all the difference. It really lets the OLED panel rip. That this revised "F" model is also cheaper than the OG Alienware OLED and the similarly glossy Philips competition seals the deal. This is our new favourite among the OLED monitor massive."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,300
Recommendations made
17,445
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.