A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
GZ2711
Company ProductName Specs




27GS95QE
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 12, 2024·

If you prioritize a monitor with exceptional contrast for deep blacks and vibrant colors, and you engage in competitive gaming where very low response time and high refresh rates are crucial, the Cooler Master GZ2711 could be a better fit despite its higher price. However, if HDR video editing and more accurate color reproduction for print photo editing are important to you, and you still want a very good gaming experience without spending as much, the LG 27GS95QE might be the more suitable option. Both monitors are excellent for HDR gaming and general media consumption. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED)
  • Good brightness
Advantages of the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)
  • The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) has no clear advantages over the Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED).

Key differences

Chevron down

Cost

$900
GZ2711
27GS95QE
$700
Product image
Product image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

The Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) has a price of $900 and the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) costs $700.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
GZ2711
27GS95QE
No
The Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing while the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.7
GZ2711
27GS95QE
9.6
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
450 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
196 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
636 nits
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
72.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) and LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

Competitive Gaming

9.6
GZ2711
27GS95QE
9.5
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
0.3 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.5 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
450 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
196 nits
The Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) and LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) are both best in class for competitive gaming.

Productivity

5.8
GZ2711
27GS95QE
5.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
111 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) and Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) are both poor for productivity.

Media Consumption

7.9
GZ2711
27GS95QE
7.7
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
450 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
196 nits
Unknown
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
636 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) and LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) are both good for media consumption.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
GZ2711
27GS95QE
Yes
Both the Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) and LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
GZ2711
27GS95QE
Yes
Both the Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) and LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
GZ2711
27GS95QE
No
Both the Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) and LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED) and the LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED)LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)
Cooler Master GZ2711 (W-OLED)LG 27GS95QE (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$900
$700
Screen Size
27"27"
Resolution
2560 x 14402560 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
450 nits196 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
Unknown636 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.3 ms0.5 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 240 Hz20 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/108/10
Ghosting Score
9.9/109.8/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
109 PPI111 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.6/106.7/10
Image Clarity Score
7/107.2/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
00
HDMI 2.1 Ports
22
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
108,200
Recommendations made
16,230
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo