If accurate color reproduction for photo editing is important to you, the Asus PA279CRV excels in that area, and it has a high color accuracy that would benefit tasks like print photo editing. However, for gaming, the Gigabyte M28U is superior due to its higher refresh rate and variable refresh rate support, which will provide smoother gameplay and less motion blur. The Gigabyte also has more robust connectivity options, including additional USB ports and HDMI 2.1, which could be important if you have newer gaming consoles or want to future-proof your setup. Both monitors have their strengths, but your choice should depend on whether you prioritize gaming and future-ready features or professional-grade color work. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PA279CRV (IPS)
Very good text clarity
Very good image clarity
Advantages of the Gigabyte M28U (IPS)
Very good for productivity
Good response time
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
4.9/10
5.7/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
17.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
7.7 ms
48 - 60 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 144 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
376 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
312 nits
The Gigabyte M28U (IPS) and Asus PA279CRV (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) is somewhat better.
Productivity
7.9/10
8.8/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
163 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
160 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M28U (IPS) is very good for productivity, while the Asus PA279CRV (IPS) is good.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Asus PA279CRV (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing while the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
5.8/10
6.1/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
920:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1228:1
376 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
312 nits
436 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
495 nits
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
65.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Gigabyte M28U (IPS) to be only fair for casual gaming, while the Asus PA279CRV (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
6.6/10
6.7/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
920:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1228:1
376 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
312 nits
436 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
495 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M28U (IPS) and Asus PA279CRV (IPS) are both only fair for media consumption.
Cost
$469
$470
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
The Asus PA279CRV (IPS) has a price of $469 and the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) costs $470.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Asus PA279CRV (IPS) and Gigabyte M28U (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus PA279CRV (IPS) and Gigabyte M28U (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus PA279CRV (IPS) and Gigabyte M28U (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus PA279CRV (IPS) and the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) compare to other monitors
"The ASUS PA279CRV is an excellent value 4K IPS monitor for color-critical work involving sRGB, Rec.709, DCI-P3 and Adobe RGB color spaces. On top of that, it features rich connectivity options, a robust design and plenty of additional features."
"Fundamentally the M28U is an impressive 4K monitor; between the resolution, refresh rate, and IPS panel, it's a great all-rounder for the step up to 4K. Even beyond PC gaming, the inclusion of a HDMI 2.1 port offers 120Hz gaming for consoles, so it's quite the multi-faceted package for its price. Gigabyte has made no major sacrifice to tick all the checkboxes with the M28U."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
125,600
Recommendations made
18,840
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.