If high-refresh-rate competitive gaming is your priority, the Dell AW2524H with its superior performance in this area would be an excellent choice. However, it has a lower resolution and might not be as suitable for productivity tasks or high-quality media consumption. On the other hand, if you need a larger screen with higher resolution for tasks like photo editing or enjoying detailed 4K content, despite not excelling in high-level competitive gaming, the Gigabyte M28U could serve you better. It also offers a good balance for casual gaming, with decent quality but not as high refresh rates as the Dell monitor. Choose the Dell for competitive gaming, or the Gigabyte for a mix of productivity and media consumption at a slightly lower price. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Dell AW2524H (IPS)
Best in class for competitive gaming
Best in class refresh rate
Good brightness
Very good response time
Advantages of the Gigabyte M28U (IPS)
Very good for productivity
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
9.5/10
5.7/10
500Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
5.5 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
7.7 ms
20 - 500 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 144 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
Yes
390 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
312 nits
The Dell AW2524H (IPS) is best in class for competitive gaming, while the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) is poor.
Productivity
4.9/10
8.8/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
91 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
160 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M28U (IPS) is very good for productivity, while the Dell AW2524H (IPS) is poor.
Media Consumption
5.4/10
6.7/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
1031:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1228:1
390 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
312 nits
464 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
495 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte M28U (IPS) is only fair for media consumption, while the Dell AW2524H (IPS) is poor.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
6.1/10
6.1/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
500Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
1031:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1228:1
390 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
312 nits
464 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
495 nits
87.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
65.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Dell AW2524H (IPS) and Gigabyte M28U (IPS) are both only fair for casual gaming.
Cost
$500
$470
$200
$300
$400
$500
$600
$700
$800
The Dell AW2524H (IPS) has a price of $500 and the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) costs $470.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the Dell AW2524H (IPS) and Gigabyte M28U (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Dell AW2524H (IPS) and Gigabyte M28U (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Dell AW2524H (IPS) and Gigabyte M28U (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Dell AW2524H (IPS) and Gigabyte M28U (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Dell AW2524H (IPS) and the Gigabyte M28U (IPS) compare to other monitors
"If you have the system for it, the Alienware AW2524H is the perfect display to show off next level frame rates and control response. With higher contrast and color volume than its 360 Hz competition, it currently has no equal."
"Fundamentally the M28U is an impressive 4K monitor; between the resolution, refresh rate, and IPS panel, it's a great all-rounder for the step up to 4K. Even beyond PC gaming, the inclusion of a HDMI 2.1 port offers 120Hz gaming for consoles, so it's quite the multi-faceted package for its price. Gigabyte has made no major sacrifice to tick all the checkboxes with the M28U."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
125,600
Recommendations made
18,840
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.