The Asus VG28UQL1A, being less expensive, offers a high-resolution 4K display that's well-suited for productivity and media consumption with good text quality and image clarity, but it falls short for HDR gaming and media. The Corsair 45WQHD240, on the other hand, excels in HDR content, with superior color and contrast, providing an immersive experience for gaming and media at a premium price. While the Asus may appeal for everyday tasks and casual gaming, the Corsair is tailored for those seeking top-tier gaming performance and vibrant media consumption. Consider your priorities: cost efficiency with the Asus or advanced gaming and media capabilities with the Corsair. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS)
Very good for productivity
Good for media consumption
Good text clarity
Good image clarity
Best in class response time
Advantages of the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED)
Very good for casual gaming
Very good refresh rate
Best in class contrast
Key differences
Casual Gaming
7.2/10
8.1/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
141 nits
350 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
632 nits
90.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
97.6 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) is very good for casual gaming, while the Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) is good.
Competitive Gaming
6.1/10
5.4/10
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.6 ms
48 - 144 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
141 nits
The Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) is poor.
Productivity
8.8/10
3.9/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
157 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
84 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
No
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) is very good for productivity, while the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) is poor.
Media Consumption
7.0/10
5.7/10
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
350 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
141 nits
350 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
632 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) is good for media consumption, while the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) is poor.
Cost
$611
$1,700
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
$2,500
$3,000
The Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) has a price of $611 and the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) costs $1,700.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
Yes
The Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing while the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) and Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus VG28UQL1A (IPS) and the Corsair 45WQHD240 (W-OLED) compare to other monitors
"The Asus TUF Gaming VG28UQL1A is, in many ways, a great 4K gaming monitor. It has a sharp, accurate image with good contrast and excellent motion clarity. Luminance uniformity is its only weakness. The monitor’s $799 MSRP is relatively affordable for a 4K HDMI 2.1 monitor, as well."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.