A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
PG49WCD
Company ProductName Specs




34WQ75C
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 12, 2024·

If you prioritize an immersive gaming and media experience, the Asus PG49WCD with its larger screen and superior contrast will deliver vivid colors and deep blacks, which is excellent for HDR content. However, it's more expensive and may not be the best for productivity due to its size and aspect ratio. On the other hand, the LG 34WQ75C is less costly and has a more conventional aspect ratio, making it better suited for daily tasks and productivity, though it won't match the Asus in gaming or media performance due to lower contrast and color volume. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Best in class contrast
  • Good brightness
  • Best in class color volume
  • Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 34WQ75C (IPS)
  • Good text clarity
  • Good image clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.8
PG49WCD
34WQ75C
5.8
5120 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
413 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
468 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
98.5 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
85.0 %
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

5.4
PG49WCD
34WQ75C
3.8
144Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
5.0 ms
48 - 144 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
413 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

9.6
PG49WCD
34WQ75C
5.9
5120 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
413 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
468 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$1,026
PG49WCD
34WQ75C
$600
Product image
Product image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

$1,400

$1,600

The Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) has a price of $1,026 and the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) costs $600.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
PG49WCD
34WQ75C
No
The Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
PG49WCD
34WQ75C
No
The Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Productivity

5.7
PG49WCD
34WQ75C
6.0
5120 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
108 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Glossy
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG 34WQ75C (IPS) to be only fair for productivity, while the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) is poor.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
PG49WCD
34WQ75C
No
Both the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
PG49WCD
34WQ75C
Yes
Both the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED) and the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED)LG 34WQ75C (IPS)
Asus PG49WCD (QD-OLED)LG 34WQ75C (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$1,026
$600
Screen Size
49"34"
Resolution
5120 x 14403440 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDLED
Screen Sub-type
QD-OLEDIPS
Refresh Rate
144Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
413 nits300 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
468 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesNo
sRGB Color Gamut
99.9 %99 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
0.03 ms5 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 144 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
6.6/105/10
Ghosting Score
10/108.2/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
108 PPI110 PPI
Coating
GlossyMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.6/107.1/10
Image Clarity Score
7/107.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
02
HDMI 2.1 Ports
10
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
108,200
Recommendations made
16,230
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo