A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
PG34WCDM
Company ProductName Specs




32GP850
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you're a competitive gamer valuing fast response times and smooth visuals, the Asus PG34WCDM with its OLED panel offers superior performance, which might justify its higher cost. Meanwhile, if you're more focused on productivity and casual gaming, the LG 32GP850 with an IPS panel provides good value and sufficient quality for day-to-day tasks at a lower price. The Asus excels in color depth and contrast, making it excellent for HDR gaming and media consumption, while the LG offers a decent experience for digital photo editing but falls short for HDR content. The size and aspect ratio of the Asus make it more immersive for gaming and movies, but the LG might be more versatile for various uses due to a more standard aspect ratio. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Good for media consumption
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Good image clarity
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 32GP850 (IPS)
  • Good brightness

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.5
PG34WCDM
32GP850
5.8
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
238 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
716 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
96.6 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

5.6
PG34WCDM
32GP850
4.8
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
180Hz
1.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
6.2 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 180 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
Yes
238 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Productivity

5.7
PG34WCDM
32GP850
5.0
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are both poor for productivity, though the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

7.5
PG34WCDM
32GP850
5.5
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1037:1
238 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
412 nits
716 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
430 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$1,300
PG34WCDM
32GP850
$600
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) has a price of $1,300 and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) costs $600.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
PG34WCDM
32GP850
No
The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 32GP850 (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
PG34WCDM
32GP850
Yes
Both the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
PG34WCDM
32GP850
No
Both the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
PG34WCDM
32GP850
No
Both the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) and LG 32GP850 (IPS) are not suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) and the LG 32GP850 (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED)LG 32GP850 (IPS)
Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED)LG 32GP850 (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$1,300
$600
Screen Size
34"32"
Resolution
3440 x 14402560 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDIPS
Refresh Rate
240Hz180Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:11037:1
SDR Peak Brightness
238 nits412 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
716 nits430 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesNo
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1.1 ms6.2 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 240 Hz20 - 180 Hz
Strobing / BFI
YesYes
Persistence Blur Score
8/107.3/10
Ghosting Score
9.6/108/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
109 PPI93 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.6/106.3/10
Image Clarity Score
7/106.3/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
01
HDMI 2.0 Ports
02
HDMI 2.1 Ports
20
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,500
Recommendations made
17,625
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo