A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Company ProductName Specs
Company ProductName Specs
What we think
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·
If you are focused on immersive media consumption and HDR gaming, the Asus PG32UCDM with its QD-OLED panel offers best in class color volume and HDR peak brightness, making your experience vibrant and detailed. However, for workspace and productivity, the ultrawide aspect ratio of the Asus PG34WCDM might be preferable, as it provides more horizontal space for multitasking. On the competitive gaming front, both monitors have very good refresh rates and response times, but the PG32UCDM's higher resolution could result in crisper images, whereas the PG34WCDM has a wider VRR range that could benefit gameplay fluidity. If reflections are a concern, the matte coating on the PG34WCDM will handle them better than the glossy finish of the PG32UCDM. Choose the PG32UCDM for a superior visual experience in gaming and media, or pick the PG34WCDM for its advantages in multitasking and better handling of reflections. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED)
- Good for productivity
- Best in class for media consumption
- Best in class color volume
Advantages of the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED)
- The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) has no clear advantages over the Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED).
Key differences
Competitive Gaming
6.4
5.6
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
0.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.1 ms
48 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
Yes
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
238 nits
The Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is poor.
Productivity
7.0
5.7
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
140 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) is good for productivity, while the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is poor.
Media Consumption
9.7
7.5
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
238 nits
250 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
716 nits
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is good.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
9.8
9.5
3840 x 2160
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
238 nits
250 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
716 nits
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
96.6 %
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) and Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.
Cost
$1,300
$1,300
$600
$800
$1,000
$1,200
$1,400
$1,600
$1,800
$2,000
The Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) has a price of $1,300 and the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) costs $1,300.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) and Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) and Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) and Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
No
No
Both the Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) and Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) are not suitable for print photo editing.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) and the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) compare to other monitors
Spec Comparison
 |  | |
| Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) | Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) |
GENERAL | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Price | |||
$1,300 | $1,300 | ||
Screen Size | |||
Screen Size | 31.5" | 34" | |
Resolution | |||
Resolution | 3840 x 2160 | 3440 x 1440 | |
Screen Type | |||
Screen Type | OLED | OLED | |
Screen Sub-type | |||
Screen Sub-type | QD-OLED | W-OLED | |
Refresh Rate | |||
Refresh Rate | 240Hz | 240Hz | |
COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Native Contrast | |||
Native Contrast | Inf:1 | Inf:1 | |
SDR Peak Brightness | |||
SDR Peak Brightness | 250 nits | 238 nits | |
HDR Peak Brightness | |||
HDR Peak Brightness | 250 nits | 716 nits | |
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | |||
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption | Yes | Yes | |
sRGB Color Gamut | |||
sRGB Color Gamut | 100 % | 100 % | |
MOTION CHARACTERISTICS | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Total Response Time | |||
Total Response Time | 0.03 ms | 1.1 ms | |
Variable Refresh Rate | |||
Variable Refresh Rate | 48 - 240 Hz | 20 - 240 Hz | |
Strobing / BFI | |||
Strobing / BFI | Yes | Yes | |
Persistence Blur Score | |||
Persistence Blur Score | 8/10 | 8/10 | |
Ghosting Score | |||
Ghosting Score | 10/10 | 9.6/10 | |
TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
Pixels Per Inch | |||
Pixels Per Inch | 140 PPI | 109 PPI | |
Coating | |||
Coating | Glossy | Matte | |
Text Clarity Score | |||
Text Clarity Score | 6.9/10 | 6.6/10 | |
Image Clarity Score | |||
Image Clarity Score | 8/10 | 7/10 | |
PORTS & CONNECTIVITY | |||
|---|---|---|---|
HDMI 1.4 Ports | |||
HDMI 1.4 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
HDMI 2.0 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.0 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
HDMI 2.1 Ports | |||
HDMI 2.1 Ports | 2 | 2 | |
Micro HDMI Ports | |||
Micro HDMI Ports | 0 | 0 | |
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | |||
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports | 0 | 0 | |
Give feedback
We're constantly perfecting our model
More comparisons for you
Compare Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) vs. LG 34GS95QE (W-OLED)
VS
Compare Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) vs. AOC AG456UCZD (W-OLED)
VS
Compare Asus PG32UCDM (QD-OLED) vs. Dell Alienware AW3225QF (QD-OLED)
VS
Compare Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) vs. Samsung Odyssey OLED G9 G95SC (QD-OLED)
VS
Compare Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) vs. LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)
VS
Compare Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) vs. Gigabyte FO32U2P (QD-OLED)
VS
FAQs
Why trust us
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
125,600
Recommendations made
18,840
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Featured in
