A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
PG34WCDM
Company ProductName Specs




32GS95UE
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 23, 2024·

If you are focused on immersive gaming with a wide field of view, the Asus PG34WCDM's curved, ultrawide screen would suit you well. It excels in contrast and is also well adapted for casual and competitive gaming. However, its resolution and color accuracy may not be the best for serious photo editing or high-end productivity tasks. The LG 32GS95UE offers a higher resolution which makes for clearer images and is more suited for tasks requiring precise detail, like digital photo editing and productivity, as well as HDR gaming and media consumption due to its high color accuracy. If budget allows and these aspects are important to you, the LG might be the better choice. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED)
  • The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) has no clear advantages over the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED).
Advantages of the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)
  • Good for productivity
  • Very good for media consumption

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

5.6
PG34WCDM
32GS95UE
6.2
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1.1 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
0.3 ms
20 - 240 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 240 Hz
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
238 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is only fair for competitive gaming, while the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is poor.

Productivity

5.7
PG34WCDM
32GS95UE
7.0
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
140 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is good for productivity, while the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is poor.

Media Consumption

7.5
PG34WCDM
32GS95UE
8.5
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
238 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
716 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is very good for media consumption, while the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is good.

Cost

$899
PG34WCDM
32GS95UE
$1,397
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) has a price of $899 and the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) costs $1,397.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
PG34WCDM
32GS95UE
No
The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

No
PG34WCDM
32GS95UE
Yes
The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.5
PG34WCDM
32GS95UE
9.7
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3840 x 2160
240Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
238 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
275 nits
716 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
96.6 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.5 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) and Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) are both best in class for casual gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
PG34WCDM
32GS95UE
Yes
Both the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) and LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
PG34WCDM
32GS95UE
No
Both the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) and LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) and the LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED)LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)
Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED)LG 32GS95UE (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$899
$1,397
Screen Size
34"32"
Resolution
3440 x 14403840 x 2160
Screen Type
OLEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
W-OLEDW-OLED
Refresh Rate
240Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
238 nits275 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
716 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesYes
sRGB Color Gamut
100 %98.5 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1.1 ms0.3 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
20 - 240 Hz48 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
YesNo
Persistence Blur Score
8/108/10
Ghosting Score
9.6/109.9/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
109 PPI140 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.6/106.9/10
Image Clarity Score
7/108/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
00
HDMI 2.1 Ports
22
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
94,100
Recommendations made
14,115
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo