A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
Studio Display
Company ProductName Specs




34WQ75C
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you prioritize exceptional image clarity, high resolution, and professional photo editing, the Apple Studio Display might suit your needs better, despite being significantly pricier. However, if you're looking for a wider screen with an ultrawide aspect ratio that might be more immersive for productivity and have a more moderate price, the LG 34WQ75C could be a better fit. Bear in mind, neither of these monitors is designed with high-spec gaming in mind, as their refresh rates are relatively low compared to dedicated gaming monitors. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Apple Studio Display (IPS)
  • Best in class for productivity
  • Good for media consumption
  • Best in class text clarity
  • Best in class image clarity
  • Good brightness
Advantages of the LG 34WQ75C (IPS)
  • Very good response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

5.0
Studio Display
34WQ75C
3.8
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
20.4 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
5.0 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
584 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The Apple Studio Display (IPS) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Apple Studio Display (IPS) is somewhat better.

Productivity

9.5
Studio Display
34WQ75C
6.0
5120 x 2880
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
218 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
No
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Apple Studio Display (IPS) is best in class for productivity, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is only fair.

Media Consumption

7.0
Studio Display
34WQ75C
5.9
5120 x 2880
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1052:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
584 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Glossy
COATING
Matte
The Apple Studio Display (IPS) is good for media consumption, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$1,599
Studio Display
34WQ75C
$600
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

$2,500

The Apple Studio Display (IPS) has a price of $1,599 and the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) costs $600.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
Studio Display
34WQ75C
No
The Apple Studio Display (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

No
Studio Display
34WQ75C
Yes
The Apple Studio Display (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

6.1
Studio Display
34WQ75C
5.8
5120 x 2880
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1052:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
584 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
N/A
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
85.0 %
Glossy
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Apple Studio Display (IPS) to be only fair for casual gaming, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is poor.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
Studio Display
34WQ75C
No
Both the Apple Studio Display (IPS) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
Studio Display
34WQ75C
No
Both the Apple Studio Display (IPS) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Apple Studio Display (IPS) and the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Apple Studio Display (IPS)LG 34WQ75C (IPS)
Apple Studio Display (IPS)LG 34WQ75C (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$1,599
$600
Screen Size
27"34"
Resolution
5120 x 28803440 x 1440
Screen Type
LEDLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS
Refresh Rate
60Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1052:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
584 nits300 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
N/AUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoNo
sRGB Color Gamut
99.1 %99 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
20.4 ms5 ms
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
5/105/10
Ghosting Score
6/108.2/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
218 PPI110 PPI
Coating
GlossyMatte
Text Clarity Score
10/107.1/10
Image Clarity Score
10/107.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
02
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo