If you prioritize professional-grade color accuracy for tasks like HDR video editing or print photo editing, and you don't mind investing in a premium product, the Apple Pro Display XDR might suit your needs due to its excellent image clarity and color performance. However, if you're looking for an immersive gaming experience with deep blacks and vibrant colors, and want to save some money without sacrificing quality, the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF provides a wider refresh rate range and is highly suitable for gaming, though it's not as well-suited for professional color work as the Apple monitor. Consider your primary use—professional creative work or entertainment and gaming—when making your choice. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD)
Best in class for productivity
Excellent text clarity
Excellent image clarity
Best in class brightness
Advantages of the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED)
Best in class for casual gaming
Excellent for media consumption
Good refresh rate
Best in class contrast
Best in class color volume
Best in class response time
Key differences
Casual Gaming
7.8/10
9.5/10
6016 x 3384
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
1600 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
240 nits
1600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
459 nits
98.7 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
99.5 %
Glossy
COATING
Glossy
The Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) is good.
Competitive Gaming
3.9/10
5.0/10
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
165Hz
20.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.4 ms
N/A
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 165 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
1600 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
240 nits
The Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) and Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) is somewhat better.
Productivity
9.8/10
5.7/10
6016 x 3384
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
216 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Glossy
COATING
Glossy
The Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) is best in class for productivity, while the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) is poor.
Media Consumption
8.1/10
9.4/10
6016 x 3384
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
1600 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
240 nits
1600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
459 nits
Glossy
COATING
Glossy
The Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) is excellent for media consumption, while the Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) is very good.
Cost
$4,999
$900
$0
$1,000
$2,000
$3,000
$4,000
The Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) has a price of $4,999 and the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) costs $900.
Digital Photo Editing
No
Yes
The Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) is not suitable for digital photo editing while the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
Yes
No
The Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) is suitable for HDR video editing and color grading while the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) is not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Print Photo Editing
Yes
No
The Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) is suitable for print photo editing while the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
Yes
Yes
Both the Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) and Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) are suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Apple Pro Display XDR (IPS FALD) and the Dell Alienware AW3423DWF (QD-OLED) compare to other monitors
"Apple's Pro Display XDR provides exceptional color accuracy and build quality at a price that's quite competitive with those of reference-grade pro monitors. It's exquisite enough that swallowing the wildly extravagant cost of its Pro Stand is worth it."
"It may seem like a minor tweak, but the addition of a glossy anti-glare coating makes all the difference. It really lets the OLED panel rip. That this revised "F" model is also cheaper than the OG Alienware OLED and the similarly glossy Philips competition seals the deal. This is our new favourite among the OLED monitor massive."
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.