A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
24G2SPU
Company ProductName Specs




32GQ850
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

The AOC 24G2SPU offers good value for casual gaming and productivity with its ample refresh rate and solid performance in those areas. However, the larger LG 32GQ850 enhances the gaming experience with a higher resolution and refresh rate, which can be significant for competitive gaming, and is also suitable for digital photo editing due to its superior color gamut. If budget allows and your focus is on competitive gaming and editing, the LG is the better option. On the other hand, if cost is a concern and your use leans towards casual gaming and general productivity, the AOC would serve you well. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS)
  • Very good response time
Advantages of the LG 32GQ850 (IPS)
  • Very good refresh rate

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

5.8
24G2SPU
32GQ850
5.2
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
260Hz
4.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.0 ms
48 - 165 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 260 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
150 nits
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is somewhat better.

Cost

$140
24G2SPU
32GQ850
$718
Product image
Product image

$0

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) has a price of $140 and the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) costs $718.

Print Photo Editing

No
24G2SPU
32GQ850
Yes
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.8
24G2SPU
32GQ850
5.8
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
260Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
150 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
89.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
98.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.

Productivity

4.9
24G2SPU
32GQ850
5.0
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
92 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
93 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 32GQ850 (IPS) and AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) are both poor for productivity.

Media Consumption

5.4
24G2SPU
32GQ850
5.3
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
2560 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
150 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
600 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are both poor for media consumption.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
24G2SPU
32GQ850
No
Both the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
24G2SPU
32GQ850
Yes
Both the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
24G2SPU
32GQ850
No
Both the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and LG 32GQ850 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and the LG 32GQ850 (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
AOC 24G2SPU (IPS)LG 32GQ850 (IPS)
AOC 24G2SPU (IPS)LG 32GQ850 (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$140
$718
Screen Size
24"32"
Resolution
1920 x 10802560 x 1440
Screen Type
LEDLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS
Local Dimming Zones
N/A16

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
300 nits150 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
N/A600 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoNo
sRGB Color Gamut
126 %135 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
4 ms8 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 165 Hz48 - 260 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
7.1/108.3/10
Ghosting Score
8.3/107.6/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
92 PPI93 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.2/106.3/10
Image Clarity Score
6.2/106.3/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
20
HDMI 2.0 Ports
00
HDMI 2.1 Ports
01
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
10

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,600
Recommendations made
17,490
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo