If you're on a tight budget and primarily use your monitor for competitive gaming, the Gigabyte G24F-2 offers a comparable gaming experience at a lower cost than the AOC 24G2SPU. However, if digital photo editing is important to you, the AOC 24G2SPU has a slight advantage in color gamut coverage, which can be beneficial for this use. Both have similar refresh rates that are suitable for casual gaming, but neither is ideal for HDR gaming or media consumption due to their limited brightness and color volume. If productivity and image clarity are significant for your daily tasks, both models offer fair performance, but neither is exceptional. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS)
Very good response time
Advantages of the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS)
The Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) has no clear advantages over the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS).
Key differences
Print Photo Editing
No
Yes
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is not suitable for print photo editing while the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.
Key similarities
Casual Gaming
5.8/10
5.7/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
170Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1100:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
89.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
95.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.
Competitive Gaming
5.8/10
5.8/10
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
170Hz
4.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
8.0 ms
48 - 165 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
48 - 180 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
No
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming.
Productivity
4.9/10
4.9/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
92 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
92 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) and AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) are both poor for productivity.
Media Consumption
5.4/10
5.4/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1100:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) are both poor for media consumption.
Cost
$140
$140
$0
$50
$100
$150
$200
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) has a price of $140 and the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) costs $140.
HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
No
No
Both the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.
Digital Photo Editing
Yes
Yes
Both the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) are suitable for digital photo editing.
HDR Video Editing and Color Grading
No
No
Both the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and the Gigabyte G24F-2 (IPS) compare to other monitors
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,900
Recommendations made
17,535
Consumer hours saved
About the monitor team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.