A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
24G2SPU
Company ProductName Specs




PG34WCDM
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you're on a tight budget and mostly engage in casual gaming and productivity tasks, the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is a cost-effective choice. It provides decent performance for day-to-day use but falls short in HDR gaming and media consumption. In contrast, the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is better suited for competitive gaming, HDR gaming, and media with its wide color gamut and higher resolution. Its OLED panel offers superior contrast and image clarity, beneficial for digital photo editing as well. However, the Asus monitor is significantly pricier, so choose this if you prioritize high-end gaming and media experiences and can afford the investment. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS)
  • The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) has no clear advantages over the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED).
Advantages of the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Good for media consumption
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Good image clarity
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.8
24G2SPU
PG34WCDM
9.5
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
238 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
716 nits
89.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
96.6 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is poor.

Productivity

4.9
24G2SPU
PG34WCDM
5.7
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
92 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
109 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) and AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) are both poor for productivity, though the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

5.4
24G2SPU
PG34WCDM
7.5
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
Inf:1
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
238 nits
N/A
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
716 nits
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is good for media consumption, while the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$140
24G2SPU
PG34WCDM
$1,300
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) has a price of $140 and the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) costs $1,300.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
24G2SPU
PG34WCDM
Yes
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

5.8
24G2SPU
PG34WCDM
5.6
165Hz
REFRESH RATE
240Hz
4.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
1.1 ms
48 - 165 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
20 - 240 Hz
No
STROBING / BFI
Yes
300 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
238 nits
The AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) are both poor for competitive gaming.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
24G2SPU
PG34WCDM
Yes
Both the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) are suitable for digital photo editing.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
24G2SPU
PG34WCDM
No
Both the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

No
24G2SPU
PG34WCDM
No
Both the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) are not suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the AOC 24G2SPU (IPS) and the Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
AOC 24G2SPU (IPS)Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED)
AOC 24G2SPU (IPS)Asus PG34WCDM (W-OLED)

GENERAL

Price
$140
$1,300
Screen Size
24"34"
Resolution
1920 x 10803440 x 1440
Screen Type
LEDOLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSW-OLED
Refresh Rate
165Hz240Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:1Inf:1
SDR Peak Brightness
300 nits238 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
N/A716 nits
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoYes
sRGB Color Gamut
126 %100 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
4 ms1.1 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 165 Hz20 - 240 Hz
Strobing / BFI
NoYes
Persistence Blur Score
7.1/108/10
Ghosting Score
8.3/109.6/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
92 PPI109 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.2/106.6/10
Image Clarity Score
6.2/107/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
20
HDMI 2.0 Ports
00
HDMI 2.1 Ports
02
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
10

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,600
Recommendations made
17,490
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo