A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
XB323U-GX
Company ProductName Specs




34WQ75C
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you're heavily into competitive gaming and are looking for a monitor with a high refresh rate for smoother gameplay, the Acer XB323U-GX would be the better choice. However, it's more expensive and might not be as good for tasks that require accurate color reproduction, like photo editing. On the other hand, the LG 34WQ75C offers a wider screen with a 21:9 aspect ratio which can enhance productivity and immersive media consumption, but it's not designed for competitive gaming due to its lower refresh rate. If you're on a tighter budget and your focus is on work and casual gaming, the LG could be more appealing. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS)
  • Very good refresh rate
  • Good brightness
Advantages of the LG 34WQ75C (IPS)
  • Good text clarity
  • Good image clarity
  • Very good response time

Key differences

Chevron down

Competitive Gaming

5.3
XB323U-GX
34WQ75C
3.8
270Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
8.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
5.0 ms
48 - 270 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
Yes
STROBING / BFI
No
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) is somewhat better.

Productivity

4.8
XB323U-GX
34WQ75C
6.0
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
91 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is only fair for productivity, while the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) is poor.

Media Consumption

5.4
XB323U-GX
34WQ75C
5.9
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The LG 34WQ75C (IPS) and Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) are both poor for media consumption, though the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is somewhat better.

Cost

$1,147
XB323U-GX
34WQ75C
$600
Product image
Product image

$0

$500

$1,000

$1,500

$2,000

The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) has a price of $1,147 and the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) costs $600.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
XB323U-GX
34WQ75C
No
The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

5.9
XB323U-GX
34WQ75C
5.8
2560 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
270Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1000:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
400 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
600 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
95.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
85.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are both poor for casual gaming.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

No
XB323U-GX
34WQ75C
No
Both the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
XB323U-GX
34WQ75C
No
Both the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Print Photo Editing

Yes
XB323U-GX
34WQ75C
Yes
Both the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are suitable for print photo editing.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Acer XB323U-GX (IPS) and the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Acer XB323U-GX (IPS)LG 34WQ75C (IPS)
Acer XB323U-GX (IPS)LG 34WQ75C (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$1,147
$600
Screen Size
32"34"
Resolution
2560 x 14403440 x 1440
Screen Type
LEDLED
Screen Sub-type
IPSIPS
Local Dimming Zones
16N/A

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
1000:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
400 nits300 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
600 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
NoNo
sRGB Color Gamut
173.4 %99 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
8 ms5 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 270 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
YesNo
Persistence Blur Score
8.5/105/10
Ghosting Score
7.6/108.2/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
91 PPI110 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.1/107.1/10
Image Clarity Score
6.1/107.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
12
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
10

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
116,600
Recommendations made
17,490
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo