A comparison of specs, key information, reviews, and best pricing from top retailers
Last updated -- hours ago | Report incorrect information
X34V
Company ProductName Specs




34WQ75C
Company ProductName Specs




What we think

Chevron down
PerfectRec Logo
The PerfectRec monitor team Learn more
Updated April 11, 2024·

If you prioritize an immersive gaming experience with deep blacks and high contrast, the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) stands out, especially for HDR gaming and media consumption. It's better for fast-paced games thanks to its higher refresh rate and lower response time, reducing ghosting. However, if you're focused on digital and print photo editing, the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) may be preferable due to its color accuracy and consistency typical of IPS panels. It offers a more budget-friendly but less premium experience, and it's less suited for high-intensity gaming or watching HDR content. The LG is also more suitable for productivity, considering the better text clarity and image consistency. Give Feedback

this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer X34V (QD-OLED)
  • Best in class for casual gaming
  • Best in class for media consumption
  • Good refresh rate
  • Best in class contrast
  • Best in class color volume
  • Best in class response time
Advantages of the LG 34WQ75C (IPS)
  • Good text clarity

Key differences

Chevron down

Casual Gaming

9.6
X34V
34WQ75C
5.8
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
1000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
99.0 %
DCI-P3 COLOR GAMUT
85.0 %
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is best in class for casual gaming, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is poor.

Competitive Gaming

5.2
X34V
34WQ75C
3.8
175Hz
REFRESH RATE
60Hz
1.0 ms
TOTAL RESPONSE TIME
5.0 ms
48 - 175 Hz
VARIABLE REFRESH RATE
N/A
No
STROBING / BFI
No
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are both poor for competitive gaming, though the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is somewhat better.

Media Consumption

9.5
X34V
34WQ75C
5.9
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
Inf:1
NATIVE CONTRAST
1000:1
250 nits
SDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
300 nits
1000 nits
HDR PEAK BRIGHTNESS
Unknown
Matte
COATING
Matte
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is best in class for media consumption, while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is poor.

Cost

$700
X34V
34WQ75C
$600
Product image
Product image

$200

$400

$600

$800

$1,000

$1,200

The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) has a price of $700 and the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) costs $600.

HDR Gaming and Media Consumption

Yes
X34V
34WQ75C
No
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is not suitable for HDR gaming and media consumption.

Digital Photo Editing

Yes
X34V
34WQ75C
No
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is suitable for digital photo editing while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is not suitable for digital photo editing.

Print Photo Editing

No
X34V
34WQ75C
Yes
The Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is not suitable for print photo editing while the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) is suitable for print photo editing.

Key similarities

Chevron down

Productivity

5.7
X34V
34WQ75C
6.0
3440 x 1440
RESOLUTION
3440 x 1440
109 PPI
PIXELS PER INCH
110 PPI
Yes
ADJUSTABLE STAND
Yes
Matte
COATING
Matte
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers LG 34WQ75C (IPS) to be only fair for productivity, while the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) is poor.

HDR Video Editing and Color Grading

No
X34V
34WQ75C
No
Both the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and LG 34WQ75C (IPS) are not suitable for HDR video editing and color grading.

Give feedback

We’re constantly working to improve.

How the Acer X34V (QD-OLED) and the LG 34WQ75C (IPS) compare to other monitors

Chevron down

Spec Comparison

Chevron down
Acer X34V (QD-OLED)LG 34WQ75C (IPS)
Acer X34V (QD-OLED)LG 34WQ75C (IPS)

GENERAL

Price
$700
$600
Screen Size
34"34"
Resolution
3440 x 14403440 x 1440
Screen Type
OLEDLED
Screen Sub-type
QD-OLEDIPS
Refresh Rate
175Hz60Hz

COLOR, CONTRAST & BRIGHTNESS

Native Contrast
Inf:11000:1
SDR Peak Brightness
250 nits300 nits
HDR Peak Brightness
1000 nitsUnknown
Suitable for HDR Gaming and Media Consumption
YesNo
sRGB Color Gamut
104 %99 %

MOTION CHARACTERISTICS

Total Response Time
1 ms5 ms
Variable Refresh Rate
48 - 175 HzN/A
Strobing / BFI
NoNo
Persistence Blur Score
7.2/105/10
Ghosting Score
9.6/108.2/10

TEXT & IMAGE CLARITY

Pixels Per Inch
109 PPI110 PPI
Coating
MatteMatte
Text Clarity Score
6.6/107.1/10
Image Clarity Score
7/107.1/10

PORTS & CONNECTIVITY

HDMI 1.4 Ports
00
HDMI 2.0 Ports
12
HDMI 2.1 Ports
00
Micro HDMI Ports
00
DisplayPort 1.2 Ports
00

Give feedback

We're constantly perfecting our model

FAQs

Chevron down

Why trust us

Chevron down
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec monitors team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest monitor information and makes it digestible for you.

By the numbers

210
Monitors evaluated
10,500
Monitors stats compiled
15
Proprietary Monitors ratings developed
117,200
Recommendations made
17,580
Consumer hours saved

About the monitor team

Joe Golden, Ph.D

CEO and Monitors Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.

Jason Lew

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.

Chandradeep Chowdhury

Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.

Featured in

Color LTT LogoGeekwire logo9to5 Mac logoPhone Arena LogoColor Daring Fireball logo