ASUS TUF Gaming F15 vs ASUS Vivobook 16

The ASUS TUF Gaming F15, with a high-performance Nvidia RTX 4070 GPU and a screen refresh rate of 144 Hz, excels in gaming and 3D applications, providing smoother visuals and more advanced graphics processing compared to the ASUS Vivobook 16, which incorporates a less powerful integrated AMD Vega 8 GPU and a standard refresh rate of 60 Hz, making it only fair for such tasks.

The ASUS TUF Gaming F15 is very suitable for engineering and design due to a powerful Intel processor, ample RAM, a high-performing Nvidia graphics card, and an IPS screen with good color coverage and contrast, which enhances visual tasks. In contrast, the ASUS Vivobook 16, with its AMD processor and onboard graphics, offers decent capabilities for engineering and design, a sharper 16:10 screen ratio, and lighter weight, making it more portable but less optimal for GPU-intensive tasks.

For general use, the ASUS TUF F15's screen offers a balance of decent resolution and brightness that satisfies everyday needs, while the Vivobook 16 provides similar benefits with perhaps a compromise on crispness due to its larger screen at the same resolution. When it comes to engineering and design, the TUF F15's color range coverage doesn't meet the high standards required for professional color work, a limitation shared by the Vivobook 16, which also falls short on delivering wide color gamuts. Regarding 3D applications and Gaming, the TUF F15's lower refresh rate doesn't support the smooth visuals preferred for high-speed graphics, a shortfall also seen in the Vivobook 16, with both lacking the quick screen response favored in these scenarios.

Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.

The ASUS TUF Gaming F15 is suited for general use due to its powerful CPU, ample RAM and high-quality IPS screen, though it is less portable and has shorter battery life; on the other hand, the ASUS Vivobook 16 also offers solid CPU performance, plenty of RAM and a quality IPS display, while being more portable with longer battery life, which could be preferable for those prioritizing mobility and longer usage away from power outlets. Both devices offer sufficient storage and good keyboard and speaker quality, but the Gaming F15 provides better overall performance which might be beneficial for more demanding tasks despite its louder operating noise and heat.

PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.

PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.

PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.