The Acer Swift 3 is less expensive and offers a balance for general use with good battery life and portability suitable for tasks like web browsing, office applications, and media consumption. It's lightweight with a touch screen and has a backlit keyboard, but it's not designed for intensive gaming or heavy 3D applications. On the other hand, the MSI GF65 Thin is more expensive and targeted towards gaming with a high-performance graphics card, faster screen refresh rate, and gaming-oriented features like ray tracing. However, it's heavier, has a shorter battery life, and isn't as portable, making it less ideal for on-the-go usage. Choose the Swift 3 for everyday tasks and mobility or the GF65 Thin for gaming and performance-heavy applications. Give Feedback
this description is based on the product variant with some specs and product variant with some specs. At the time of writing, the variant with some specs cost some dollars and the variant with some specs cost some dollars.
Advantages of the Acer Swift 3
Good for general use
Good for engineering and design
Good for software development
Good for content creation
Good overall build quality
Very good portability
Very good battery life
Advantages of the MSI GF65 Thin
The MSI GF65 Thin has no clear advantages over the Acer Swift 3.
Key differences
General Use
7.7/10
6.5/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
309.0 nits
DISPLAY BRIGHTNESS
262.0 nits
12.0 Hours
BATTERY LIFE
4.5 Hours
7.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.0/10
8.9/10
PORTABILITY SCORE
7.3/10
The Acer Swift 3 is good for general use, while the MSI GF65 Thin is only fair.
The Acer Swift 3 is well-suited for general use thanks to its balance of a robust processor, ample RAM for multitasking, and an IPS screen providing clear visuals, combined with its lightweight design and long battery life, making it highly portable. In contrast, the MSI GF65 Thin, while possessing a powerful processor and dedicated graphics, is held back by lower RAM, which can hinder multitasking, and its heavier weight and shorter battery life make it less ideal for carrying around or extended use away from power sources.
Content Creation
7.6/10
6.8/10
7.1/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
4.6/10
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
16.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
The Acer Swift 3 is good for content creation, while the MSI GF65 Thin is only fair.
PerfectRec’s Content Creation Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for photo editing, video editing and other content creation tasks.
Software Development
7.6/10
6.3/10
7.1/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
4.6/10
16.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
7.0/10
KEYBOARD QUALITY SCORE
7.0/10
The Acer Swift 3 is good for software development, while the MSI GF65 Thin is only fair.
PerfectRec’s Software Development Score takes into account the many different features of the laptop that make it more or less suitable for software developers.
Screen Quality
6.8/10
6.8/10
14.0in
SIZE
15.6in
1920 x 1080
RESOLUTION
1920 x 1080
IPS
DISPLAY TECHNOLOGY
IPS
60Hz
REFRESH RATE
144Hz
309.0 nits
BRIGHTNESS
262.0 nits
The Acer Swift 3 has a better screen than the MSI GF65 Thin for general use, engineering and design, software development, and content creation, while the MSI GF65 Thin has a better screen for gaming and AI.
The Acer Swift 3's screen has a balance of resolution and brightness suitable for everyday tasks and productivity software commonly used in engineering, providing clarity and comfort for extended use, but its lower refresh rate makes it less ideal for fast-paced gaming and 3D rendering. The MSI GF65 Thin's display, while offering an acceptable experience for browsing and casual software applications, lacks the color accuracy and wider color gamut that professionals in engineering and design would require for precision work. Additionally, the refresh rate on both laptops is not high enough to satisfy gamers and 3D artists who look for smoother visuals and quicker response times for an immersive experience.
Battery
12.0 Hours
4.5 Hours
The Acer Swift 3 has 12 hours of battery life. The MSI GF65 Thin has 4.5 hours of battery life.
Battery life estimate is based on a mix of common use patterns. More portable and higher performing laptops tend to have less battery life.
Portability
Very Good
Good
14.0in
SIZE
15.6in
2.7 lbs
WEIGHT
4.1 lbs
0.6in
THICKNESS
0.8in
The Acer Swift 3 has very good portability, while the MSI GF65 Thin has good portability.
The most portable laptops are small, thin, and light.
Build Quality
7.4/10
6.7/10
The Acer Swift 3 has good build quality, while the MSI GF65 Thin has only fair build quality.
PerfectRec’s Build Quality Score incorporates case materials, display and keyboard flex, hinge quality, and overall reliability.
Cost
$500
$1,100
$0
$500
$1,000
$1,500
$2,000
The Acer Swift 3 has a price of $500 and the MSI GF65 Thin costs $1,100.
The MSI GF65 Thin and Acer Swift 3 are both only fair for gaming and AI.
The Acer Swift 3 has a lower-performing integrated GPU and a standard screen refresh rate, making it less suited for demanding gaming and 3D tasks, while the MSI GF65 Thin features a dedicated, higher-performing GPU and a higher screen refresh rate, which better supports these applications but comes at the cost of greater weight and potentially lower battery life.
Engineering and Design
7.1/10
6.7/10
7.1/10
OVERALL CPU SCORE
4.6/10
3.7/10
OVERALL GPU SCORE
6.1/10
16.0 GB
RAM
8.0 GB
Although they have very similar scores, PerfectRec considers Acer Swift 3 to be good for engineering and design, while the MSI GF65 Thin is only fair.
The Acer Swift 3 is suitable for engineering and design thanks to its ample RAM and powerful CPU, providing smooth multitasking, and its high screen quality for vivid visuals, while remaining highly portable and relatively quiet during operation.
Give feedback
We’re constantly working to improve.
How the Acer Swift 3 and the MSI GF65 Thin compare to other laptops
"With the Swift 3, Acer delivers a 14-inch laptop with a sleek, slim metal chassis. The latter is of high quality and sturdy enough for everyday use, which is a real plus point among the 700-Euro (~$798) models. A new feature is Thunderbolt 4 in the Type-C format for peripherals or even displays (DisplayPort via Type-C). Unfortunately, a card reader is still missing, and the RAM is completely onboard, so there are no upgrade options here. Acer's 14-incher is affordable, yet it does everything most would want from a truly mobile laptop: Long battery life, a great display, quality, sufficient ports, light weight, and low noise and heat emissions."
"The MSI GF65 Thin offers a GeForce RTX 3060 on a budget. The MSI GF65 is a relatively inexpensive RTX 3060 laptop and, perhaps not coincidentally, it also comes with a slower-than-average RTX 3060 GPU. Other laptops we've tested thus far with the same GPU are about 10 to 15 percent faster. CPU performance is also slightly slower than average unless if users decide to enable Cooler Boost mode. Colors, black-white response times, Thunderbolt, and DisplayPort are either average or completely omitted. Gamers who want to maximize performance-per-dollar without sacrificing RAM or SSD upgradeability will find the lightweight MSI GF65 attractive."
Get a great deal on the Acer Swift 3 or the MSI GF65 Thin
About Acer
Acer is a prominent Taiwanese electronics brand which makes a wide range of laptops, with multiple product lines catering to personal use, gaming, and business use. They are renowned for having exceptional value for money, as they frequently offer good specifications at a lower price than other manufacturers.
About MSI
MSI, also known as Micro-Star International, is a Taiwanese technology corporation. MSI is known for their wide range of gaming devices. Their series include the entry-level Cyborg/Thin and Sword/Katana series, the mid-range Bravo/Delta and Crosshair/Pulse series, and their high-end Vector, Raider, Stealth, and Titan GT series. At every performance level, MSI offers a variety of devices with varying balances between performance, battery life, weight, and price, making them a solid option to consider at every price point.
This information was produced and vetted by the PerfectRec laptops team. We are a product research and recommendation organization that meticulously reviews and evaluates the latest laptop information and makes it digestible for you.
By the numbers
380
Laptops evaluated
48,640
Laptops stats compiled
13
Proprietary Laptops ratings developed
116,295
Recommendations made
25,198
Consumer hours saved
About the laptop team
Joe Golden, Ph.D
CEO and Laptops Editor
Joe is an entrepreneur and lifelong electronics enthusiast with a Ph.D in Economics from the University of Michigan.
Jason Lew
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Jason is a staff expert and software engineer that has been making laptop recommendations for 7 years and moderates one of the largest laptop subreddits.
Chandradeep Chowdhury
Staff Expert & Software Engineer
Chandradeep is a staff expert and software engineer and expert in televisions and monitors. He’s been making monitor recommendations for ten years.
Craig Russell
Laptops Expert
Craig is a UK-based laptops expert. Craig works in IT, where he recommends and supports laptops and PCs for clients and has been recommending laptops on Reddit for five years.